LOL at the tags! Wade blows GOATS? It's steel not steal? Wading through the dung? Wade + Killerbee= #1 team! Team what? Team douche-bag? :roflmao:
I used to think that the software generated the tags.
"Dang, that software is GOOD!!!"
LOL at the tags! Wade blows GOATS? It's steel not steal? Wading through the dung? Wade + Killerbee= #1 team! Team what? Team douche-bag? :roflmao:
LOL at the tags! Wade blows GOATS? It's steel not steal? Wading through the dung? Wade + Killerbee= #1 team! Team what? Team douche-bag? :roflmao:
Price? I'd like to know that myself. Steel will probably be more money since the machining time is higher, and they are using billet (based on DPmag blurb).
Weight isn't as low as possible if they are billet. There are limits as to what you can machine out of billet. Investment casting would be lighter. But is weight going to be a problem? I honestly don't know. Higher weight WILL reduce bearing life, put more stress on crank, pin, rods, and reduce HP. The question is how much? A computer simulation could generate what the stresses are. Due to physics, this problem gets worse geometrically as piston speed climbs. Velocity squares the load, it's not linear. Twice the RPM makes 4 times the load.
Mahle certainly has the resources to do the math, but the question is whether Mahle will release any info.
For what it's worth, a properly designed monotherm should weigh about the same as a race aluminum piston. We saw that back in the late 90's when running against the DAF trucks. We had some of the two piece pistons (steel tops with aluminum skirts) and they weighed less than the DAF's all aluminum pistons. The old two piece pistons were the precursor to the monotherms. I guess the big question is about the billet material. I thought all montherms were forged, but maybe this was a cheaper / quicker way (not having to modify a die) to give us a steel piston without all the long lead time.
From looking at the pic, they could have went a lot lighter for a race Dmax piston. You don't need the toroidal (donut shaped) bowl, you could do like the Arias and go "dished turbo" design since you're not worried about emissions.
The first pistons we ran in Casper with aftermarket rods were actually "shortened". In other words, there were no valve reliefs and no delipping, we cut the material straight off the top squish area. Didn't seem to change much. For some reason, that engine rev'd like a LS1.
I've often wondered if you could just do a flat-top Dmax piston with 2 rings for racing apps. This would make the lightest possible design and subject the piston to the least amount of heat input.
Isn't a portion of the duramaxes efficiency tied to it's bowl-style pistons? Do you not think flat tops would put a big dampener on the combustion process of the HPCR platform?
Do any other HPCR engines ever have flat top pistons? Do any performance engines use flat tops? I would have thought dome or dish were more common place than plain flat tops, no?
I guess what compression that would be lost from any shortening of the piston height would/could be more than picked up by filling in the bowl. Hello 22:1 CR.
Just thinking out loud. Got me chewing on it now.
More than some but less than most. Thanks for asking so we could clear that up.....but what would i know...
Live from SEMA...Chad at Alligator posted this pic on FB.. Thanks Chad :hug: Don't see any TTS on them.
cost?????
So the marking on the tops of pistons, whether from proper tuning or total blow torch erosion is from a star shaped flame propagation not from direct injector spray pressure?