Sean (copperhead) and I are very close friends. We do a lot stuff engine wise back and forth with each other, same for suspension and other things. Unbeknownst to Ken, I’ve been involved with this turbo deal as two sets of eyes are better than one. Specially when AZ has VERY few people here that actually have knowledge on them and work on them. This isn’t a cheap build that was thrown together. My post much earlier in this thread about finding him a shop to have the truck worked on we’re not just bull shit posts, everyone was quite scared over the epa raids and they have been back a second time since then. Ken has some money into it and we wanted to make sure things were taken care of with the Danville turbo. Sadly that wasn’t the case. Oil pressure and volume was verified when the DT turbo came off and when the Danville turbo came off. New up pipe gaskets were used upon install of the Danville as well as boost leak tested. When it was brought back in, the up pipe gaskets were checked for leaks and well as a bunch of other things (up pipe cracks, loose manifold bolts, plugged drain, so on), nothing was found. If he had an oil issue, it was in the turbo outside our control.
I did not drive the truck after initial Danville turbo install but sean put some run time on the truck. it was mainly some idle time and easy driving up and down his side street for “turbo break in” knowing ken was going on this trip to Cali. Ken knows his truck better than we do so the “lazy feel” was not really noticed in the easy driving.
Take it for what it’s worth but diag shows pretty clear it was just a turbo failure outside our control. It sucks that this coincidence happen to happen to Ken being the DT turbo died and Danville turbo died. Still waiting to hear what the issues was on the DT turbo but based on the issues I know that DT is trying to work out with their turbos, that was a bane/unison ring issue. That’s just a guess till I hear back on it but has mostly been the issue.
Actually, I agree with everything you said. Knowing Mark personally and how he runs his business, that turbo of his would've been packed appropriately to avoid damage, even by monkeys wearing brown.Just to clarify, after the MAP sensor sees ~X amount of boost, I have set the vanes to open up accordingly. I've tuned hundreds upon hundreds of VGT compound setups over the years with no issues. Its not rocket science. Yes some tuners set Min Vane Position way too high if a modified charger is ran as a single, once a atmo charger is added to the setup, those tables MUST be adjusted properly to keep, boost/drive pressures, turbo shaft speeds in check. If forgotten you're looking at problems. Yet some hack tuners cant get modded VGTs to work so they get way to aggressive with the vane/boost tables which also leads to catastrophic failures.
Ken stated to me that on the test drive right out of the Seans shop door, the truck felt super lazy compared to the previous charger, also was making a odd noise that he didn't expect it to have but figured that was apart of the new charger as it was built from someone else so wasn't knowing what to expect right of the bat. That threw a red flag after he mentioned what it acted like right out the door. This build will get back on the road shortly hopefully:thumb: Never know some UPS driver could have butterfingered it unloading it.. No offense Tom lol
I don't know alot about this particular situation but I find it odd that many are defending poor customer service if that is what is going on. I'm a residential contractor, If we install a new roof and it leaks it is not acceptable to leave the concern open for any extended period of time. And as far as people being busy, everyone is right now, that's not an excuse. Sometimes you lose money when you run a business, thats part of business. So as I said, i don't know whats what in all this, but defending poor customer service doesn't fly with me.
I have no reason to bash anyone, I don't know any of the people involved. And it really doesn't matter what service one provides, customer service is customer service. Garret's warranty being a hassle is not the customers problem at all.You guys act like it's been months. He was pissed the same day the turbo got back to Danville. You guys need to understand the volume that goes through that shop on a daily basis. This is the shitty part about having to ship is the down time. Sounds like they are keeping in touch and answering the best that they can.
It's not like they can just ship out a new turbo everytime one fails. It's a process to get a warranty claim through Garrett and anyone that deals with Garrett knows the head aches of dealing with them. Once again. Patience is key. Also it's not a wise thing to bash before company returns your turbo. At this point the damage is done.
I do agree that someone higher up in the company needs to reach out to you. All of my employees know when something of this nature is happening that I need to be notified because it's my reputation.
Many guys sticking up for Danville and say stay calm are the ones that run a buiness and have been in the game a long time. They know how these type of situations go. It's a loose loose. I hope to see Mark chime in soon.
So let’s say you do a roof and there is a leak. Do you rip the entire roof back off and start from scratch, or do you just fix the leak? It seems to me like you might need to start replacing the whole thing because your customer paid for a new roof not a roof with a repair.I don't know alot about this particular situation but I find it odd that many are defending poor customer service if that is what is going on. I'm a residential contractor, If we install a new roof and it leaks it is not acceptable to leave the concern open for any extended period of time.
Sean (copperhead) and I are very close friends. We do a lot stuff engine wise back and forth with each other, same for suspension and other things. Unbeknownst to Ken, I’ve been involved with this turbo deal as two sets of eyes are better than one. Specially when AZ has VERY few people here that actually have knowledge on them and work on them. This isn’t a cheap build that was thrown together. My post much earlier in this thread about finding him a shop to have the truck worked on we’re not just bull shit posts, everyone was quite scared over the epa raids and they have been back a second time since then. Ken has some money into it and we wanted to make sure things were taken care of with the Danville turbo. Sadly that wasn’t the case. Oil pressure and volume was verified when the DT turbo came off and when the Danville turbo came off. New up pipe gaskets were used upon install of the Danville as well as boost leak tested. When it was brought back in, the up pipe gaskets were checked for leaks and well as a bunch of other things (up pipe cracks, loose manifold bolts, plugged drain, so on), nothing was found. If he had an oil issue, it was in the turbo outside our control.
I did not drive the truck after initial Danville turbo install but sean put some run time on the truck. it was mainly some idle time and easy driving up and down his side street for “turbo break in” knowing ken was going on this trip to Cali. Ken knows his truck better than we do so the “lazy feel” was not really noticed in the easy driving.
Take it for what it’s worth but diag shows pretty clear it was just a turbo failure outside our control. It sucks that this coincidence happen to happen to Ken being the DT turbo died and Danville turbo died. Still waiting to hear what the issues was on the DT turbo but based on the issues I know that DT is trying to work out with their turbos, that was a bane/unison ring issue. That’s just a guess till I hear back on it but has mostly been the issue.
So if LML turbos are failing regularly would it be unreasonable to put an earlier style charger in the truck and modify the hot crossover pipe or are they a tuning nightmare? All of the previous generation chargers seem to be proven as hell from almost any manufacturer.
So if LML turbos are failing regularly would it be unreasonable to put an earlier style charger in the truck and modify the hot crossover pipe or are they a tuning nightmare? All of the previous generation chargers seem to be proven as hell from almost any manufacturer.
My one question I have here is......
Do we know if mark is even aware of this thread on here?
Yeah he is on here posting slips but I doubt he reads every single thread like some of us. Hell I don’t even read every one.
He is. I messaged him about this over a week ago and he told me came and saw the thread.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My question has been answered then.
Thanks for clearing that up Ken.
dont put words in my post that are not there. i never said LML turbos fail regularly.