We started making our own early last year.
Ours are .500 thick, trying to give a little more clearance between the pan and the chassis without giving up the needed structure of the girdle. In a truck where we have room I make them .750.
I hadn't seen a Gorrilla girdle in person. I had a customer bring one by today for us to install in his engine. I took one look and told him not to bother. In my opinion they are way too thin to have any effect.
I don't mean to be harsh on someone else's product, I was just so suprised to see how thin they are.
guy , trying to learn here, so i hope this isnt taken by people on here the wrong way but, why would you ever need this in a block designed with the caps seated below the pan rail? i can see where a girdle would help in a old sbc or bbc where the caps are above the rail and have a tendancy to move around some in high horsepower motors. with these blocks it seems that the block would be sort of a girdle and billet main caps would be the upgrade suited for it . like i said i could be way off on this , but just trying to understand it better
....because the caps can still walk when the engine is pushed hard....even at ~550rwhp/3500rpm levels. Saw evidence of it on my engine when I tore it down. That being said, I did not install a girdle when I rebuilt.
Question: When you install one of these girdles, no matter the make, dont you have to line-hone the mains first? Seems you should, what with using studs instead of OEM bolts.
Billet main caps? Oh hell no....Im a stock rebuild. I like taking crazy risks.
IMHO......The block is flexing. Fill it and don't look back
What is the recommended fill for the length for drive time. Is it true that a filled block is a one pass and cool motor? Half fill them then??
Another thing... I keep hearing "cap walk". What is that? I think it means the caps are moving around on the main bearings, right?
What I'm wondering is like the other guy, how can this happen with the supported caps the way they are in the block? Is it really the caps moving relative to the main bearings/crank? Seems to me the caps are actually pretty well held in place but perhaps it's actually the block flexing in the "webs" that support the caps and that flex is what moves the caps around causing what folks are calling "cap walk"?
So if that's the case, then the two common angles of fixing this would be stronger caps or some kind of brace for the webs that'll add support to them & keep them in place, a la girdle.
Of those two, in my mind, it seems the girdle would be much superior to stiffer caps by tying all of the caps & webs together by a common brace. Whereas the caps just give extra resistance to the flex in each web of the block that it's in and not make one strong, connected unit, no?
Anyone have an opinion on my thoughts? Am out in left field totally lost or understanding somewhat what's going on?