Jneal's truck 71mm cheetah injectors, stock internals
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_dV2fzITiU&feature=channel_page
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_dV2fzITiU&feature=channel_page
Why would drive pressure be much lower with twins? Isn't drive pressure created by restrictions in the exhaust, i.e. the turbo?? If this is the case, a twin setup would have more drive pressure.
With twins and the right tuning drive pressure is nearly 1:1. Twins definitely will run lower EGT's, and you can get away with less fule dow low since you dont need it to light the big charger.
There is a purpose for twins, just like any other modification. There is no "free lunch" though. Air is air, different builds and purposes have different needs.
The "dream" system would have 100% compressor efficiency at all operating conditions, but that is not possible. If you are in the "sweet spot" of a single charger, it can be as high as 80%. The sweet spot with compound twins can't go higher than 64%. But they should have a wider sweet spot, and better efficiency at boost levels over 45psig when targetted right.
Shortly I'll be logging information we get running twin chargers, but our purpose is max effort at high RPM. This is not a normal application, but I do expect it to be streetable. A single is not going to make 75psi boost without generating huge amounts of heat, if at all, so we have no other options.
Pat can you expand on the 80% v/s 64% a bit more, not sure I'm following and go ahead and explain the math I'll try and muddle through it. Thanks.
All air compressors are less than 100% efficient. That means you spend more energy driving them than the energy stored in the compressed air. Where does the "lost" energy go? In a turbocharger, it becomes heat which is passed into the air it's compressing.
The best turbo compressors are 80% efficient, give or take. If you must compress the air twice, it would be 80% x 80% or 64% peak efficiency.
But let's say you want 75psi air. No single compressor we have access to is more than perhaps 50% efficient at that pressure, probably lower. But you could target a compound setup at 75psi and be 64%.
So 64% of 75 pounds is 48 pounds of air so in order to get 48 pounds of air out of a single that is 80% efficient, you only have to make 60 pounds of boost.
I can reasonably understand why twins are quicker but not faster in the 1/4 mile. It depends on the maps obviously. But if I understand right at the same amount of air PSI, the single is more efficient and "should" put down the bigger number hp wise, but the twin will have more boost available at a given lower rpm. Now how to calculate the maps when you twin things. I wish I was smarter.
Now how to calculate the maps when you twin things.
Comments are just makin me excited and about to make me want to call MPI