I'm in Hell! Hope yinz are all doing better than I am!!! :rofl:
simon you're putting words in my mouth.
im not saying its totally detestable or unlivable. Most people might not even notice it, but im picky....and I noticed it. Now that I live at 6,500', I would probably notice it more.
For a race truck going for ultimate performance/HP I would definitely run a lower static CR. But for a truck that I literally drive/use every day and maybe only really crank up/race every other weekend, id rather keep the snappiness of stock CR.
You can compensate a lot of it out with tuning, but that last little bit is just a trait of running low static CR on a turbocharged diesel.......
It is kinda ironic how some will fight until the end saying elevation has little to do with how these motors run. its nice to see someone that is in agreement with me finally. My motors have been at 15/1, 16/1, and now 16.5/1 and each motor has been more fun to drive, less smoke and more responsive.
I know a guy who is getting a built motor who will be using these. I'm looking forward to getting some real world experience with them.
Not a member here I guess?
Have you played around with different cams and these pistons yet Mark?
The pistons are out of "Testing" IMO and just gaining some real world time. The design has changed very little in the last year. And then, only to accommodate customer requests.
As far as compression ratios go, I suggest 16.5:1 for the daily driver. Higher and they tend to rattle too much for my taste and any efficiency is getting offset by ring blowby anyway. Lower, and you need to adjust the tune a bit and have some cold weather haze.
I am running 17.5:1 now and have been thinking of bumping down. If only to quiet the rattle. I can't imagine the rattle of 18:1's I just shipped out.
15.5 is about as low as I feel comfortable going with Cast Pistons. The oil gallery gets in the way of going lower without taking more material from over the pins.
The lower limit for the forged is still up in the air. I am currently analyzing the 14:1 pistons here to see what the trade offs are. 15:1 is easy and 14.5:1 are doable as of now with valve reliefs.
Mark is by far my best customer so far for these pistons. If you haven't noticed, he loves them, and I am tickled that he, and his customers are happy. They have added a comfort margin to his builds that he was lacking before.
Have ran stock cam, 3388 SoCal, 6480 SoCal(what is in mine), and will be doing a 9100 SoCal combo very soon. The 3388 works great but my motor with the 6480 is just plain loud! This cam in a normal mahle forged 16.5:1 was not one of my favorites, kinda lazy feeling without alot of rpm gain. I had this cam on the shelf used because we replaced it with a 9100 in a 2.6 puller to gain more topend power. In my motor it acts completely diferent, with great response and definitely wants to rev hard and the thump out the pipe is rediculous, it is so loud. I think this cam will rock with the twins when I put an 88mm over my 72mm vgt. It's all about the combination and the compression ratio with this piston design acts completely different than the normal mahle round chamber and I think this is why my experience is so different than the masses, idk.