Piston Bowls

mtl_dmax

New member
Dec 7, 2010
114
0
0
Eastern Canada
we do gapless rings in all of our builds as well as my personal motor, well worth the cost. They really help with reduction of blow by

they can do this to any second ring in our motors so you know


Thanks for the tip on those. I suspect I've got some blowby on my motor currently and was looking for a good solution which might help with that without doing a full blown rebuild (more than I want to spend right now). Only looking for maybe 450-500HP max and as much fuel economy as I can get out of it.
 

Cknight199

New member
Aug 23, 2012
1,827
0
0
Salt Lake City, Utah
Just read this whole thread. This was a huge accomplishment and I will be running these if I ever build my motor. I am stunned that no one has broken one. It would be nice to see some high horsepower runs on these to really test them. I mean there's really no way to tell how much abuse they can take without breaking them... We could only be touching their potential at 1000 hp and not even know it..
 

Cknight199

New member
Aug 23, 2012
1,827
0
0
Salt Lake City, Utah
It would be interesting if you could get Dimitri Millard to throw a set in his duramax :) he isn't afraid to blow anything up. I watched his lb7 tow truck do 1799 hp on stock pistons. Granted his engine blew right then and he used 8 tanks of nos but it was sweet!
 

malibu795

misspeelleerr
Apr 28, 2007
8,239
550
113
42
in the buckeye state
milage count pistons went in about ~142k there's ~197k on the odo to date.. so ~55k on the pistons since turkey day last year..

milage update ODO is just under 210,000 puts mileage on the pistons about 68,000
mpg is pretty steady about 10.5mpg, best i have seen is 11.8 empty getting out of chester NH heading to erie PA.. its still down from the 12.5 i was seeing loaded with stock.. and 14mpg with the empty trailer

i called up mahle to ask what stock PTW and mahle specs for their pistons. and what are some things that would allow the oil to soot up faster (now less then 1000 miles vs before clean for 3000).. IE ring gaps

talked to eric at mahle motorsports..
stock is .0018" -.002"
mahle recommends .002-.003" for their pistons.
when i asked him what he thought about .004" PTW he asked what type of competition i was doing...

stock ring gaps via all data
1st .0539
2nd .0531

according to eric for every .001" in crease in PTW it opens the ring gap up by .002" that would explain my ring gaps being .004" bigger than stock.. there is no aftermarket file to fit rings for the dmax according to mahle

mine was built with .004" PTW and ring gaps are .058", couple that with an extra .010" quench over stock, stock is .020".
i feel i can say that an engine setup like this is ~10% less efficient then stock. while purely using MPG avg since it is the most steady variable that i can track on a daily basis.

only way to tighten the PTW is new block, both ring gap and quench can be fixed/doctored with gap less rings and decked.. neither are going to happen anytime soon..

to me blow-by is energy that is not used/wasted in moving the truck down the road and $$$ out the exhaust pipe.. while one will never have 0 blowby.. but i can build an engine on the tighter side of the specs, especially at the almost/below stock power im putting out, put as much through the exhaust ports vs PCV tubes.

this was a general answer to a question while back about eficency between stock the finger bowl designs that was asked by someone in one of these thread i can remember who or where..

hope you guys find that info usefull :thumb:
 

mtl_dmax

New member
Dec 7, 2010
114
0
0
Eastern Canada
to me blow-by is energy that is not used/wasted in moving the truck down the road and $$$ out the exhaust pipe.. while one will never have 0 blowby.. but i can build an engine on the tighter side of the specs, especially at the almost/below stock power im putting out, put as much through the exhaust ports vs PCV tubes.

this was a general answer to a question while back about eficency between stock the finger bowl designs that was asked by someone in one of these thread i can remember who or where..

hope you guys find that info usefull :thumb:


I totally agree and very helpful info, thanks again! :thumb:
 

malibu795

misspeelleerr
Apr 28, 2007
8,239
550
113
42
in the buckeye state
I totally agree and very helpful info, thanks again! :thumb:

normally these are thing i know before building or rebuilding.. :eek:
given the circumstances around my build/rebuild as stated below.. my biggest complaint/regret is i wish i had more time to be more informed. i would have built a much tighter engine.

i broke at the end of the day on 11/21(thanksgiving eve) 300 miles from home hauled truck and loaded trailer home (two trips and a bus trip home),
11/24-25 pulled engine and striped it down
11/26 dropped it off at the machine shop monday
11/27 drove to Pittsburgh picked up the pistons and dropped of for final honing and balancing at the machine shop
11/30 evening had everything back ready to assemble ,
12/1-12/2 assembled and road tested
12/3 hooked to the load and rolled out with ~30 miles on the engine.
11.5 days roughly from start to finish through a 4 holiday weekend too..

merchant auto(parts), fingers and local machine shop, played vital roles in me being able to turn around that quick.

things are little different when you have a customer asking when their load is going to be delivered :eek:
 

S Phinney

Active member
Aug 15, 2008
4,008
18
28
Quncy, Fl
milage update ODO is just under 210,000 puts mileage on the pistons about 68,000
mpg is pretty steady about 10.5mpg, best i have seen is 11.8 empty getting out of chester NH heading to erie PA.. its still down from the 12.5 i was seeing loaded with stock.. and 14mpg with the empty trailer

i called up mahle to ask what stock PTW and mahle specs for their pistons. and what are some things that would allow the oil to soot up faster (now less then 1000 miles vs before clean for 3000).. IE ring gaps

talked to eric at mahle motorsports..
stock is .0018" -.002"
mahle recommends .002-.003" for their pistons.
when i asked him what he thought about .004" PTW he asked what type of competition i was doing...

stock ring gaps via all data
1st .0539
2nd .0531

according to eric for every .001" in crease in PTW it opens the ring gap up by .002" that would explain my ring gaps being .004" bigger than stock.. there is no aftermarket file to fit rings for the dmax according to mahle

mine was built with .004" PTW and ring gaps are .058", couple that with an extra .010" quench over stock, stock is .020".
i feel i can say that an engine setup like this is ~10% less efficient then stock. while purely using MPG avg since it is the most steady variable that i can track on a daily basis.

only way to tighten the PTW is new block, both ring gap and quench can be fixed/doctored with gap less rings and decked.. neither are going to happen anytime soon..

to me blow-by is energy that is not used/wasted in moving the truck down the road and $$$ out the exhaust pipe.. while one will never have 0 blowby.. but i can build an engine on the tighter side of the specs, especially at the almost/below stock power im putting out, put as much through the exhaust ports vs PCV tubes.

this was a general answer to a question while back about eficency between stock the finger bowl designs that was asked by someone in one of these thread i can remember who or where..

hope you guys find that info usefull :thumb:

Stock ring gaps are not at .053. You have the wrong rings if you have that much clearance on gaps. You can also use gapless rings to fix the blow by issue or get the right rings. Usually I see .018-.020 on top rings and .025-.027 on second rings.
 

malibu795

misspeelleerr
Apr 28, 2007
8,239
550
113
42
in the buckeye state
New rings:

First Ring 0.0118-0.0177 in
Second 0.0197-0.0256 in

If your gap was that big, you had the wrong rings. Which would have been my fault for not checking.

Stock ring gaps are not at .053. You have the wrong rings if you have that much clearance on gaps. You can also use gapless rings to fix the blow by issue or get the right rings. Usually I see .018-.020 on top rings and .025-.027 on second rings.

they are that big. :eek:
 

malibu795

misspeelleerr
Apr 28, 2007
8,239
550
113
42
in the buckeye state
It's not even that. The bore would be almost exactly .010" too big to get that gap. Ouch.

:confused: :(

true the math would indicate that....i dont have a bore guage, so i couldnt do a quick check while assembly..

the rings where checked after being squared in the bore with a piston.

i will say there is no indication of piston slap regardless of what is out of spec..
 

mtl_dmax

New member
Dec 7, 2010
114
0
0
Eastern Canada
Stock ring gaps are not at .053. You have the wrong rings if you have that much clearance on gaps. You can also use gapless rings to fix the blow by issue or get the right rings. Usually I see .018-.020 on top rings and .025-.027 on second rings.


I was curious why most people weren't just automatically putting in the gapless piston rings?

Are there any major drawbacks to using them at all?
 

malibu795

misspeelleerr
Apr 28, 2007
8,239
550
113
42
in the buckeye state
I was curious why most people weren't just automatically putting in the gapless piston rings?

Are there any major drawbacks to using them at all?

outside additional cost, possible lead times and lack of knowledge that they exist, would be my guess..
i didnt find out that they existed till after i had mine assembled. i found them by happenstance clicking through MA site..
 

mtl_dmax

New member
Dec 7, 2010
114
0
0
Eastern Canada
outside additional cost, possible lead times and lack of knowledge that they exist, would be my guess..
i didnt find out that they existed till after i had mine assembled. i found them by happenstance clicking through MA site..


At least in the rare instance you might ever tear back into your motor, you could add a set of those in and gain some efficiency back that way.
 

delong_1

<< my work
Dec 5, 2008
1,282
0
0
38
Arvada, CO
the company we use has a pretty fast turn around time, i just dont think its something a lot of companies talk about.
 

malibu795

misspeelleerr
Apr 28, 2007
8,239
550
113
42
in the buckeye state
At least in the rare instance you might ever tear back into your motor, you could add a set of those in and gain some efficiency back that way.
that's a possibility but one is looking at 1000.00 in parts roughly and 3 days down time.. i'd really like to get it decked as well to bring me closer to stock quench..
the company we use has a pretty fast turn around time, i just dont think its something a lot of companies talk about.

who do you go through?
 

MarkBroviak

DMax Junkie
Vendor/Sponsor
May 25, 2008
2,134
464
83
Danville Indiana
Just read this whole thread. This was a huge accomplishment and I will be running these if I ever build my motor. I am stunned that no one has broken one. It would be nice to see some high horsepower runs on these to really test them. I mean there's really no way to tell how much abuse they can take without breaking them... We could only be touching their potential at 1000 hp and not even know it..

I have several trucks well over 1000hp with the cast oval pistons. Mine is at 1085hp and I have been driving it everyday on the big tune just to push it. I have a set of 200% injectors and triples about to go on it to increase the hp to over 1200hp! Should get really interesting...:happy2: