Manifolds, Up Pipes what brand?

Dan@PPE

Diesel Enthusiast
Aug 8, 2006
2,570
0
36
So Cal.
We still use aircraft grade bellows, and they were made to my specs for this application.

Really? When did this change? You wanted to buy OUR better "air craft grade bellows" (when yours were failing) But you said they were too expensive....

We also make our up pipes one piece now that we can bend them in house.

I am glad to hear that you used OUR idea on this. (you must of copied our bends when I sold you a bunch of them back is 2010). This is a MUCH better way of doing it then the multiple cuts and welds you used before.

We however use a nodular iron casting. One of the strongest castings out there and we have never had a single manifold failure. You might be able to say that too, but you don't have the time behind you to have it mean anything. ;)

Don’t you mean ductile Iron? No our manifolds have not been out as long as yours but I can assure you of their reliability as Garrett also tested them on their Thermal cycling Rig. How can you say that nodular/ductile Iron is the strongest casting out there??? Here is some info on the comparison of ductile/nodular iron vs Hi-sil molly http://www.ductile.org/didata/Section5/5intro.htm#High Silicon with Molybdenum

“SILICON- MOLYBDENUM DUCTILE IRONS
Alloy Ductile Irons containing 4-6% silicon, either alone or combined with up to 2 % molybdenum, were developed to meet the increasing demands for high strength Ductile Irons capable of operating at high temperatures in applications such as exhaust manifolds or turbocharger casings. The primary properties required for such applications are oxidation resistance, structural stability, strength, and resistance to thermal cycling.
These unalloyed grades retain their strength to moderate temperatures (Figures 3.21, 3.22, 3.23), perform well under low to moderate severity thermal cycling (Figure 3.37) and exhibit resistance to growth and oxidation that is superior to that of unalloyed Gray Iron (Table 3. 1). Ferritic Ductile Irons exhibit less growth at high temperatures due to the stability of the microstructure. Alloying with silicon and molybdenum significantly improves the high temperature performance of ferritic Ductile Irons while maintaining many of the production and cost advantages of conventional Ductile Irons.
Back to Top
Effect of Silicon
Silicon enhances the performance of Ductile Iron at elevated temperatures by stabilizing the ferritic matrix and forming a silicon-rich surface layer which inhibits oxidation. Stabilization of the ferrite phase reduces high temperature growth in two ways. First, silicon raises the critical temperature at which ferrite transforms to austenite (Figure 5.1). The critical temperature is considered to be the upper limit of the useful temperature range for ferritic Ductile Irons. Above this temperature the expansion and contraction associated with the transformation of ferrite to austenite can cause distortion of the casting and cracking of the surface oxide layer, reducing oxidation resistance. Second, the strong ferritizing tendency of silicon stabilizes the matrix against the formation of carbides and pearlite, thus reducing the growth associated with the decomposition of these phases at high temperature.
The oxidation protection offered by silicon increases with increasing silicon content (Figure 5.2). Silicon levels above 4% are sufficient to prevent any significant weight gain after the formation of an initial oxide layer.”

Read the link above if anyone wants more info on the material we use and the benifites

My offer still stands. We can call it " put up shut up 2. " :roflmao: I'll bring a set of the ProFlows for testing too. ;)

You can do whatever testing you would like. We have already spent a good deal of money testing these parts. There are too many UNCONTROLLED factors when dyno testing parts (special parts, The dyno operator, Fudging of info). I am sure the proflows work well :D
 

RickDLance

Active member
Feb 14, 2007
1,276
14
38
I quit using your prebent pipes because they weren't right. Many customers saw that also. They complained to me about your parts thinking I had made the up pipes also. I had always planned on bending mine. Thats why I bought the bender years ago. It just took a while to get it up and running.

As far as the bellows I had priced yours before I had my own designed. I found things I didn't like about the ones you were using. I hope you corrected them by now.



Face it Dan we can argue back and forth forever. I'll stop if you redesign you stuff without using my design as your own. That means move the location where they both bolt together.
Now even after this is done you'll need to take me up on my challenge. Otherwise you have no leg to stand on with some of these claims. I'll even take Todd's advice and we can do it at the track somewhere.;)

Then you'll need to drop the claims that you have an industry first in the egr riser up pipe. ;)

If you agree to these mild requests I'll consider leaving my comments out from now on.
 
Last edited:

Dan@PPE

Diesel Enthusiast
Aug 8, 2006
2,570
0
36
So Cal.
I quit using your prebent pipes because they weren't right. Many customers saw that also. They complained to me about your parts thinking I had made the up pipes also. I had always planned on bending mine. Thats why I bought the bender years ago. It just took a while to get it up and running.

Yes there was a small issue in our Jig, The bent pipes are still the same design as they have been. After the jig was fixed we have not had ONE complaint.


As far as the bellows I had priced yours before I had my own designed. I found things I didn't like about the ones you were using. I hope you corrected them by now.

Interesting.... you never mentioned ANYTHING to me about something you did not like about them (other than the price). NO! there have been no changes to the bellows from the get go. Guess what? We have had ZERO (0) failures of our bellows. Can you say the same? (you dont need to answer that, as I know the answer to that one already)


Face it Dan we can argue back and forth forever. I agree on this... We can both keep pissing in the wind but we are going to both end up with yellow clothes and smelling like piss.I'll stop if you redesign you stuff without using my design as your own. That means move the location where they both bolt together.
Now even after this is done you'll need to take me up on my challenge. Otherwise you have no leg to stand on with some of these claims. I'll even take Todd's advice and we can do it at the track somewhere.;)

Then you'll need to drop the claims that you have an industry first in the egr riser up pipe. ;)

If you agree to these mild requests I'll consider leaving my comments out from now on.

Test away! But If you find your product does not compare to ours, are you man enough to post it?????:thumb:
 

RickDLance

Active member
Feb 14, 2007
1,276
14
38
So you're gonna quit copying my up pipe design and move the location?

Test away! But If you find your product does not compare to ours, are you man enough to post it?????:thumb:

Yes, send me a set. I'm surprised you asked. You know I am.

What about the egr riser bs?

And to answer your question, I've only had one bellows failure that was actually the bellows fault and it wasn't on a set of castflows. ;)
 
Last edited:

Dan@PPE

Diesel Enthusiast
Aug 8, 2006
2,570
0
36
So Cal.
No I dont think that will change... That is set in stone (more like sand).:D

What is the issue on the EGR riser?
 

RickDLance

Active member
Feb 14, 2007
1,276
14
38
OK, so so far you have admitted to a direct copy of my up pipes without my consent, and you copied my manifolds enough that the port location is exactly the same.

You won't accept my open challenge to a dyno test or a track test to determine if your set or mine is best in actual power gains.

Then you suggest that I won't be honest about it anyway, and we still haven't gotten to why you claim an industry first on a egr riser on aftermarket up pipes when I've been doing it for over a year now.

I think I'm done for now. :) Sorry to derail the thread guys.
 

Dan@PPE

Diesel Enthusiast
Aug 8, 2006
2,570
0
36
So Cal.
OK, so so far you have admitted to a direct copy of my up pipes without my consent, and you copied my manifolds enough that the port location is exactly the same.

Nope never admitted that (we had your consent before we designed them)! Ours uses (1) pcs pipes, different flanges, different bellows. But it appears you are now copying ours funny how that works huh.... You must of copied GM then because your port location is the same. How can you change port location if you are using stock heads? Are you modifying the heads now for your manifolds?

You won't accept my open challenge to a dyno test or a track test to determine if your set or mine is best in actual power gains.

As I said go ahead and test them. However there are WAY too many variables to make any test "BELIVEABLE" when parts are being tested on the dyno or the track. Again we have already tested them the correct way, with the proper controlled environment and can assure you that there is not a better cast manifold design available right now

Then you suggest that I won't be honest about it anyway, and we still haven't gotten to why you claim an industry first on a egr riser on aftermarket up pipes when I've been doing it for over a year now.

were it this written at?

I'm sorry if you took that as me saying you are dishonest (was not my intention).

I think I'm done for now. :) Sorry to derail the thread guys.
..
 

emiller3

He's Back
Feb 21, 2009
3,586
0
36
42
lake charles,LA.
As I said we have ran both , on two different trucks. But the rdl set came with larger up-pipes and didn't have the crease in the passenger side.
 

Dan@PPE

Diesel Enthusiast
Aug 8, 2006
2,570
0
36
So Cal.
Emiller,

You have compound turbos (no down pipe running behind the up pipe) so you dont need the ones with the flat spot in them. we offer a full circle design for twin applications (no flat spot for down pipe clearance). They are the same price as out regular manifold and uppipes. We have them in stock and on the shelf!