I have a coder in the Philippines working on modifying that existing emulator sketch. Hope to see a demo in a few hours.Did the arduino emulator thing get done?
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
I have a coder in the Philippines working on modifying that existing emulator sketch. Hope to see a demo in a few hours.Did the arduino emulator thing get done?
Your so needy Ken...That is Very Interesting... Will be good to know if we can verify that in real time on the bench. Would sure explain WHY that Crank signal is so darn important..
I'm almost finished with my bag of Skittles. Starting to wire up some POTs in place of sensors like MAP and Fuel Pressure. If you could share the PCM to Fuse Block diagram, that would be helpful also. I left all that in tact, but trying to get a grip on how the Key works in the Med Duty.. There seems to be a Crank Trigger wire in this ECM harness, as would be used by a 2500 with BCM.. So has me wondering..
It's noted on the LLY not the LB7 in the Medium Duty....I would think the 90°delay would apply to both the LB7 and LLY if it applies to one, even if it's not noted in the LLY info... but what do I know? Lol.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
But Wait, There's more!!!You guys are throwing so much info out there so quickly its making my head spin.
I would tend to agree. One would think that big processor chip does more than just some simple diagnostic tasks. But if I recall, isn't there a slight difference start of injection timing between the LB7 & LLY in tune files? And we have the difference in our control line structure.. Maybe the engineers figured out how to remove the processing lag by 03. Would love to pick those brains over a beer or two...I would think the 90°delay would apply to both the LB7 and LLY if it applies to one, even if it's not noted in the LLY info... but what do I know? Lol.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
I find it interesting that wasn't noted on anything else I have seen but just happened to be listed on that Medium Duty Schematic where they call it an EDU instead of a FICM.I would tend to agree. One would think that big processor chip does more than just some simple diagnostic tasks. But if I recall, isn't there a slight difference start of injection timing between the LB7 & LLY in tune files? And we have the difference in our control line structure.. Maybe the engineers figured out how to remove the processing lag by 03. Would love to pick those brains over a beer or two...
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
All the LB7 and LLY electrical diagrams for the light duty call the FICM the EDU. Even the fuse box doesI find it interesting that wasn't noted on anything else I have seen but just happened to be listed on that Medium Duty Schematic where they call it an EDU instead of a FICM.
There is always the possibility that the LLY doesn't have the same lag, but just because it's not listed on circuit diagrams doesn't mean it's not there. Only testing, getting the raw code or talking to someone who designed it will tell for sure at this point.I find it interesting that wasn't noted on anything else I have seen but just happened to be listed on that Medium Duty Schematic where they call it an EDU instead of a FICM.
Same here haha.You guys are throwing so much info out there so quickly its making my head spin.
I hit every pin on that FICM with a scope searching for something resembling K line or Class 2 data. Nothing..There is always the possibility that the LLY doesn't have the same lag, but just because it's not listed on circuit diagrams doesn't mean it's not there. Only testing, getting the raw code or talking to someone who designed it will tell for sure at this point.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk