I think weight of truck is extremely relevant to the topic.
According to the calculator I was around 750-760, got 3 full 1/4 mile passes and 5 1/8rh miles passes before I lost a piston.
Two years ago I dyno'ed 702 and made about 100 1/4 mile runs, last year on the same motor I made 760 and made about 40 1/8 mile runs and about 40 1/4 mile runs all on the stock long block. The last race I went to last year I wanted to see what it could do so I had Mark turn it up. I made 2 passes and the engine started to tick. It was not loud and there was no white smoke so i made 3 more runs with it ticking. When I rebuilt my motor all 8 rods were bent and 3 of them were hitting the crank as they came around. The engine still ran good even with the bent rods.
I really like hearing this . Mark just dyno tuned my truck and I would love to see it stay together for a couple years so I can build a motor at my own pace .
I really like hearing this . Mark just dyno tuned my truck and I would love to see it stay together for a couple years so I can build a motor at my own pace .
Two years ago I dyno'ed 702 and made about 100 1/4 mile runs, last year on the same motor I made 760 and made about 40 1/8 mile runs and about 40 1/4 mile runs all on the stock long block. The last race I went to last year I wanted to see what it could do so I had Mark turn it up. I made 2 passes and the engine started to tick. It was not loud and there was no white smoke so i made 3 more runs with it ticking. When I rebuilt my motor all 8 rods were bent and 3 of them were hitting the crank as they came around. The engine still ran good even with the bent rods.
Was that when you had the twin's on it? I am hoping to get in the high 600's with my LLY but am wondering if I'm starting to walk on thin ice. I'd like to twin it to try an help keep some cool air in it, but an wondering if the money is better spent on rod's instead of a S480
Twins will be very hard on a stock bottom end. You can produce allot of bottom end torque with twins, You would be safer to go with a big single this will push the torque up in the RPM's and be a little easier on the rods.Yeah thats what I figured, and will probably do...Twins are just sooo badass though lol :thumb:
Twins will be very hard on a stock bottom end. You can produce allot of bottom end torque with twins, You would be safer to go with a big single this will push the torque up in the RPM's and be a little easier on the rods.
Either setup IMOP is the same on the rods and both can be made safer if you increase the rpm range , the initial spool up difference isnt what bends rods , both will make close to equal torque IMOP when the 4-5 shift is made and the truck gets drug down to 2600 rpm 's ( turbo's stay fully spool through every gear after 1st ) This to me is the most stress the rods will likely see is when in the highest gear. When talking about de- torquing, its not just about how the fuel is brought in after WOT most de torquing methods go out the window or else they hinder performance , the only way to stay out of torque is to move shift points / rpm range up regardless of what turbo is used . The exception is when rolling into the throttle but a simple tcm change and forcing a down shift will still keep the truck out of peak torque as long as the shift point is raised .
What does it matter? They are only going to last a couple passes at that power level anyway....