What's special about the banks balancer? The ati is what SoCal diesel has recommended for ever. But they sell that too so it's just like banks lol. I like hearing these decisions
What's special about the banks balancer? The ati is what SoCal diesel has recommended for ever. But they sell that too so it's just like banks lol. I like hearing these decisions
Well, most dampeners use a vulcanized rubber that is injected between the two balancer masses. It bonds to the metal. No rubber bands......
No rubber bands....
Sent on the run from my Cell Phone
I'd like to see Gale run one of his engines wide open for 800 hours.
Again not the point
But ok
I think his point is when someone misleads you by saying rubber bands, they're probably not being completely truthful, or they don't know what they're talking about.
I'm sorry I mentioned rubber bands
Gale did not
I was just going with Fluidampners knock
I would take an ATI over all the above mentioned on any application mainly in a higher HP setup.
I would take an ATI over all the above mentioned on any application mainly in a higher HP setup.
Here is a some CAD files for your viewing pleasure on where the Rubber band idea is coming from. No matter the Damper after X period of time they all should be replaced.
Why?
What proof says they are better than viscous?
I still have not seen anything except here say.
Gale swears by them and I haven't seen 1 viscous add from Banks.
Not to bash but I am trying to get real world info.
Thanks for any!
Just out of curiosity would this mean by putting a new aftermarket balancer on to replace a current aftermarket one after x amount of time, that the rotating assembly would need rebalanced?
OK, Back on topic.
Is there a basic advantage to a fluid Vs solid balancer? Probably not. A well constructed one of either will probably last just fine. The issue is if one is better at absorbing harmonics than the other. (HARMONIC balancer)
THAT can only be told by testing.
Any takers?