Converter lock up WITHOUT a lock up box
- Thread starter Chevy1925
- Start date
Which tables would I need to change on the 6 speed. I'm having trouble with my converter locking in 2nd at WOT.
Well, I think I'm gonna give this a try. Just need Kory to reply to my email. Maybe he missed my last email and I should send a couple more
Well, I think I'm gonna give this a try. Just need Kory to reply to my email. Maybe he missed my last email and I should send a couple more
Resend! Inbox was cleared today before I left....
On a new server now that rocks so should be fine!
I sent willie a pm, he was gonna get ahold of ya! Figured I'll give them a try. I mean, what better way to celebrate my trans build, right?! I'll leave it in willies hands :thumb:
I haven't been able to get mine to work. I've tried disabling the TCC Apply Slip Inhibit option, bumped my TCC on ramp rates way up, and tried raising the TCC apply inhibit limit values, and can't get it to do anything consistently.
Mine works like a champ. I haven't touched my lockup box since the day I flashed the new tcm tune in. I can run the exact same times with the tcm tune vs with the lockup box. Works perfect every time, all the time.
Mine works great! I had flashed a non lock up setup tune in to try and fix another issue I was having and I hated not having that lock up. There were time at partial throttle (about 2/3-3/4 throttle) where I'd expect the stock non lock up to hit like lock up tune and it would way later than usual. Flashed the lock up tune back in and she works much better
Why do I just have D5233? I just have the enable, disable... I dont have the rpm slip amount to control, no D5231 nor D5232
So I just got done installing my new converter. Truck sat for the weekend with batteries unhooked..long story short, went for the test drive earlier tonight and everything was good, put the pedal to the floor and the trans would not shift properly, would sit there like it hit a Rev limiter then buck a bit and finally make the shift, converter also couldn't make up its mind if it wanted to stay locked or unlocked...
Pulled out the v2 and reflashed the tune and now it is all better...weird. Now on to the point of this post..
got looking at the slip inhibit function and have been wanting to compared lock up with the function disabled vs enabled but raising the slip up to 3000+ rpm. I've been running the tcm tune with the function disabled all together for months and it works good. You get lockup but it felt a tad late still. So I enabled the function and raised the slip to 3100 rpm...all I have to say is it is MUCH better. Lockup happen immediately when it is supposed to this way. I should have done this long ago.
Pulled out the v2 and reflashed the tune and now it is all better...weird. Now on to the point of this post..
got looking at the slip inhibit function and have been wanting to compared lock up with the function disabled vs enabled but raising the slip up to 3000+ rpm. I've been running the tcm tune with the function disabled all together for months and it works good. You get lockup but it felt a tad late still. So I enabled the function and raised the slip to 3100 rpm...all I have to say is it is MUCH better. Lockup happen immediately when it is supposed to this way. I should have done this long ago.
Last edited:
Thats good info. I only tested it briefly since I have a lockup box that works perfectly, and could ever get it to lock as fast, always felt like it was later than it should be. I will test that out.
I may have spoken too soon, my converter wants to keep unlocking with the slip function enabled raised to 3100 rpm. I switched back to "disabled" and so far so good but I think im done testing for the night, I've been bombing up and down the highway...people might start asking questions at 1am
I too have noticed some minor quirks with this...it seems to take some fiddling with the tables to make it work...and sometimes it still gets delayed a bit.
Certainly way better than stock, but "something" still seems a little off. And my favorite slick-shifting 2001 OS isnt supported.
Certainly way better than stock, but "something" still seems a little off. And my favorite slick-shifting 2001 OS isnt supported.