The rods are weaker. For some reason the rods like to twist in the lml at higher hp levels. It looks like they are thinner up top at the wristpin area. the pistons are not that great either; I believe they are hyperutectic material. He is better off using lbz rods and lb7 pistons than the lml stuff.IMO I think the rods will be ~10% stronger than LBZ/LMM, thats about it.
pistons are anyones guess.
The rods are weaker. For some reason the rods like to twist in the lml at higher hp levels. It looks like they are thinner up top at the wristpin area. the pistons are not that great either; I believe they are hyperutectic material. He is better off using lbz rods and lb7 pistons than the lml stuff.
The whole point is to see how the LML parts hold up, not use stuff that we already know about.
sorry, i was trying to save you some greif, but go ahead and try putting lml parts together, since you are hell bent on doing so.
We can imagine how they maybe stronger or weaker by looking at them, but how do you know they tend to twist? Just another guess, or is that a fact? Not knocking just curious
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
I don't aim to speak for dmaxvaz but I believe he's a tech for GM that gets to dyno engines (including the dmax) long before they are ever put in trucks... He was talking about the LML a good bit before the trucks were out. :thumb: Evidently, it appears he's pushed a couple to their limits.
X2...
Good info.
We'll be glad to listen to all you know!
Seems like everytime I buy a damn new truck something gets worse on them..
:feedback: Just wonderin if you gave it a honest bashin yet