injectors = broken crank ?

JoshH

Daggum farm truck
Staff member
Vendor/Sponsor
Feb 14, 2007
13,712
773
113
Texas!!!
I am not saying I think injectors break cranks. I'm saying it has been said that injectors break cranks, and I'm just trying to come up with ways that an injector might break a crank. I did not ever say that the injectors in Jay's truck are what caused his failure. I also didn't say the timing would change. The beginning and end of the injection cycle should not change at all. It would just be like one (or more) injector is significantly larger than the others. I don't know for sure what that would do to the engine, but I can see how it might be possible that having 7 injection pulses the same size and one much larger would put a lot of stress on the crank. I imagine it being kind of like an impact. When you are turning the bolt with an impact it is all turning in the same direction, but when the hammer hits the anvil it creates pressure spikes. I don't know for sure if what I'm saying is anywhere near correct, but I imagine the higher flowing injector being like the hammer hitting the anvil.
 

racinmike77

New member
Sep 14, 2008
1,029
0
0
MD
I am not saying I think injectors break cranks. I'm saying it has been said that injectors break cranks, and I'm just trying to come up with ways that an injector might break a crank. I did not ever say that the injectors in Jay's truck are what caused his failure. I also didn't say the timing would change. The beginning and end of the injection cycle should not change at all. It would just be like one (or more) injector is significantly larger than the others. I don't know for sure what that would do to the engine, but I can see how it might be possible that having 7 injection pulses the same size and one much larger would put a lot of stress on the crank. I imagine it being kind of like an impact. When you are turning the bolt with an impact it is all turning in the same direction, but when the hammer hits the anvil it creates pressure spikes. I don't know for sure if what I'm saying is anywhere near correct, but I imagine the higher flowing injector being like the hammer hitting the anvil.

I think you are referring to the tips only and big dipper is referring to the injector bodies. ;)
 

LBZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
Jul 2, 2007
9,903
149
63
46
B.C.
IF you can't notice the engine running rough due to injector balance being out, then I doubt that there would be enough of an out of balance issue from the injector to make a crank fail, unless it ran for a long time like that, or the Harmonic Balancer was shot but by then you would likely have many other problems surfacing as well.
 

RENODMAX

Dead Wrong
Mar 4, 2008
3,602
0
0
If we are talking harmonics let's talk a bone stock motor. People always jump to the injectors because that's what they read on the Internet. A bone stock motor will be so out of balance it'd shock those that put their hands on keyboards instead of hard parts.
 

racinmike77

New member
Sep 14, 2008
1,029
0
0
MD
If we are talking harmonics let's talk a bone stock motor. People always jump to the injectors because that's what they read on the Internet. A bone stock motor will be so out of balance it'd shock those that put their hands on keyboards instead of hard parts.


I agree but dont you think a harmonics issue will be magnified by HP?
 

JoshH

Daggum farm truck
Staff member
Vendor/Sponsor
Feb 14, 2007
13,712
773
113
Texas!!!
I think you are referring to the tips only and big dipper is referring to the injector bodies. ;)
What makes you think that? I'm talking about the flow of fuel coming out of an injector when it is installed in an engine being a significant amount off from another injector installed in the same engine.
IF you can't notice the engine running rough due to injector balance being out, then I doubt that there would be enough of an out of balance issue from the injector to make a crank fail, unless it ran for a long time like that, or the Harmonic Balancer was shot but by then you would likely have many other problems surfacing as well.
I'm not really sure how noticeable something like that would be. I know when I killed a piston in my engine, I didn't notice it running rough until I got stopped, but I guarantee that one cylinder was doing a LOT less work than the other 7. Not sure how that compares to one cylinder creating more power though.
 

LBZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
Jul 2, 2007
9,903
149
63
46
B.C.
That's when you would notice it Josh is at idle unless you have a really keen ear and are really in tune with your engine and how it runs. It would even be more noticeable when in gear at idle.

I notice it more than most do but that's because I work around engines for a living and after awhile, I start to notice stuff like that. I'm not saying I'm special, I just have acquired more of an ear for this sort of thing.;)
 

JoshH

Daggum farm truck
Staff member
Vendor/Sponsor
Feb 14, 2007
13,712
773
113
Texas!!!
Unless you are running extremely high rail pressure at idle, I don't think mismatched injectors would be very bad at idle. Besides that, the balance rates should smooth it out unless it was out far enough that they couldn't make up for it. In that case, it should throw misfire codes.
 

LBZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
Jul 2, 2007
9,903
149
63
46
B.C.
Unless you are running extremely high rail pressure at idle, I don't think mismatched injectors would be very bad at idle. Besides that, the balance rates should smooth it out unless it was out far enough that they couldn't make up for it. In that case, it should throw misfire codes.

Exactly. Unless they were way out you probably wouldn't notice them. And by way out, I mean like 15-20% or more, not 2-3%. Which, like was previously said, would be cleaned up by the ecm until it throws a code.
 

BIG DIPPER

New member
Nov 6, 2006
205
0
0
Unless you are running extremely high rail pressure at idle, I don't think mismatched injectors would be very bad at idle. Besides that, the balance rates should smooth it out unless it was out far enough that they couldn't make up for it. In that case, it should throw misfire codes.

So is it safe to say you think the ECM only balances at idle and that there is no multiplying factor used in the upper RPM range based off of the balance rate that it used during idle? Also, other than the crank not being able to handle that other "hammer" hit....is it the crank is just too weak or would being incosistent be the killer? What if it was the other way around and you had 7 on par and 1 that was light instead of heavy?

Not sure I do either, but I do believe there is plenty more going on in the ECM that we are able to see.

NO I am not saying balanced injectors as opposed to nozzles or comparing anything of the like. The original quote was that a crank failed and the poster basically said that a baanced set of injectors would deter this......long story short. I would like to hear from him though.....
 

LBZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
Jul 2, 2007
9,903
149
63
46
B.C.
One that was light could still be found with a balance test. And it would also cause a missfire code if the engine could not manage it. I don't believe there is any more of a correction factor at idle then there is at say 2000 rpm because the load changes so much quicker as does everything else. That's why balance tests are reccomended to be done at idle in park because it is as controlled of a test we can do. Also, this why power contribution tests are done at the higher rpm's to measure cylinder performance while monitoring injector flow. Done with the tech 2 of course.

The only thing I can see changing at higher rpm's is the range that is allowable for injector balance at higher rpm's before the ecm throws a missfire code, but I can't say for sure as I don't believe this range is something we can see - yet.......
 

JoshH

Daggum farm truck
Staff member
Vendor/Sponsor
Feb 14, 2007
13,712
773
113
Texas!!!
Exactly. Unless they were way out you probably wouldn't notice them. And by way out, I mean like 15-20% or more, not 2-3%. Which, like was previously said, would be cleaned up by the ecm until it throws a code.
I think the argument is it may be only 2-3% at 4000 psi with an idle quantity fuel pulse, say 500 uS, but at 26k psi and 2800 uS it may be more along the lines of 30%.

So is it safe to say you think the ECM only balances at idle and that there is no multiplying factor used in the upper RPM range based off of the balance rate that it used during idle? Balance rates zero out under certain parameters of which I can't remember off the top of my head, but it's something like 1000 RPM, 5 mph, and some certain amount of accelerator pedal position that completely escapes me right now. Also, other than the crank not being able to handle that other "hammer" hit....is it the crank is just too weak or would being incosistent be the killer? I can see where the argument could be made that the hammer hit and rebound could flex the crank and allow it to rebound. Given enough cycles of this, it could fatigue the crank kind of like when you bend a wire back and forth until it breaks in half. What if it was the other way around and you had 7 on par and 1 that was light instead of heavy? No idea.

Not sure I do either, but I do believe there is plenty more going on in the ECM that we are able to see.

NO I am not saying balanced injectors as opposed to nozzles or comparing anything of the like. The original quote was that a crank failed and the poster basically said that a baanced set of injectors would deter this......long story short. I would like to hear from him though.....
I really don't know how accurate anything I'm saying is. I'm kind of playing devil's advocate to see what kind of ideas and theories we can come up with on this.
 

JoshH

Daggum farm truck
Staff member
Vendor/Sponsor
Feb 14, 2007
13,712
773
113
Texas!!!
The only thing I can see changing at higher rpm's is the range that is allowable for injector balance at higher rpm's before the ecm throws a missfire code, but I can't say for sure as I don't believe this range is something we can see - yet.......
When I had my bent rod problem, I never threw a misfire code except at idle. When I blew a hole in my piston, it never threw a misfire code, but it didn't idle much at all. I'm not sure how long it needs to see the misfire condition before it throws the code. I'm assuming it throws the code based off of balance rates, and as mentioned above, balance rates zero out when you are driving.
 

LBZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
Jul 2, 2007
9,903
149
63
46
B.C.
I think the argument is it may be only 2-3% at 4000 psi with an idle quantity fuel pulse, say 500 uS, but at 26k psi and 2800 uS it may be more along the lines of 30%.

I really don't know how accurate anything I'm saying is. I'm kind of playing devil's advocate to see what kind of ideas and theories we can come up with on this.


I see. This is where the power contribution tests and injector tests with the tech 2 would make these problems show up.
 

JoshH

Daggum farm truck
Staff member
Vendor/Sponsor
Feb 14, 2007
13,712
773
113
Texas!!!
What are power contribution tests and what does an injector test with a Tech II consist of? I've never done either of those before.
 

JoshH

Daggum farm truck
Staff member
Vendor/Sponsor
Feb 14, 2007
13,712
773
113
Texas!!!
I'm talking in the motor....not sending the injectors to anyone.

I'm also not saying it would correct any higher or lower using the balance rates, but to use the same factor throught the entire pull. Say it increased on injector by 2, would it continually increase it by 2 the entire run, or does it just go to pulsing on and off according to a chart.... I would have to believe they do not do any correcting regardless of what the balance rates are at idle. Balance rates are constantly changing, but once you reach the parameters that stop it, they all go to zero.

Just to clear something up, Jay had these in his truck before I met him, so there is no personal agenda here with anyone other than the fact that the injectors were pointed at first as well as being said that they were not flowed as a complete injector. This is why I wanted the thread started. Not to find out all the reasons a crank would break, but to hear how a non matched set of injectors could cause it. I would just look at it as abuse, but that's just me using what I have learned over the years with personal experience, not reading internet posts from people who have no personal experience and form all their opinions from what they read on the internet or what they are told......they will be in here soon. In this case, I tend to agree with you. Jay's truck has to be putting out a lot of power, possibly more than any other duramax out there right now, and I'm guessing it sees a lot more miles than many other trucks that are in the same league as it. I'm just trying to come up with how an injector might cause a crank to fail.

Josh...I know...appreciate the conversation. Although what I am saying about the hammer hit is.... If it is just more of a shock, wouldn't that be like having a stronger combustion...so that is saying if it didn't hold it from one cylinder, it surely couldn't hold it from all 8? I wish I had a lot more knowledge on this subject so I could talk about it much more intelligently. Unfortunately, I really don't know how to answer your question. All I can say is I can see how maybe it is possible that having one cylinder hitting harder can do things to the crank that I can't even pretend to understand. Without having an engineering degree in engine design, I'm not sure I would ever be able to fully comprehend what is going on in there.

The injector test allows you to turn off injectors.
You can do that with EFILive too, but what are you watching?
 

LBZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
Jul 2, 2007
9,903
149
63
46
B.C.
What are power contribution tests and what does an injector test with a Tech II consist of? I've never done either of those before.

Basically, the way I understand it, is the tech 2 commands a certain rpm and rail pressure and the tech monitors injector flow rates to determine if the injector is good or bad.

They can also see how much % of the load each cyl is supporting across the board if I'm not mistaken and that is the power contribution.

I've personally never worked with a tech 2 but this is how it was explained to me by a GM tech when he was diagnosing a diminishing rail pressure issue I had!;):D
 

J Spruill

bringer of truth
Mar 30, 2008
770
0
16
chalk it up to things just break.often times what makes one part in a certain truck isnt the coffin nail of the same part breakage in another truck.injects with the high pressures they see can go to crap in a short amount of time,however i dont see them breaking a crank unless it open so bad it hydrolocked and then i would think the rod would bend first.is the motor apart yet?what other parts show wear until this info is given out the rest is speculation at best.

last topic prolly wrong place and may tick a few peoplke off,but on a properly balanced engine set up an aftermarket dampner isnt needed...
 

GMC_2002_Dmax

The Still Master
I am going to weigh in here since I have tuned a ton of trucks with all different injectors from different shops.

At Merchants a few years ago Jay and Eric had very similar motor builds, both trucks were tuned by me and the only difference was the injectors, Jay's truck was way down on power compared to Eric's, at the time I was sure the injectors were crap.

Fast forward a few years, Jay's truck in it's current set-up IMHO was in need of a much bigger set of injectors because of the amount of air he has and power he is making vs the pulse width needed to get him into the low 10's or even 9's as that is the goal.

I believe that as long as the injectors suit the build and are within a few % of flow especially at WOT then you will be fine.

What I disagree on is when they are not matched very well you may have different cylinder pressures but the constant load on the crank per cylinder should be close to the same otherwise I believe that by applying different loads to different crank journals at high rpms, making big power will cause the harmonics to go off even with a balanced assembly leading to catastrophic failure.

Think of it as having a tire that is just a little out of balance, at low speed you may not notice it but at high speeds it shakes the truck.

I am not taking sides here either, I have tuned trucks with Socal, Big Dipper, Extrude Honed, II, Burkhardt, MA etc.

Some run better than others, some won't run worth a shit.

;)