Found the noise in my engine

mick

Try anything
Aug 15, 2006
482
0
0
Forestdale. Brisbane.Australia
So it seems if the piston was tighter in the hole and not allowed to "rock", then maybe it wouldnt have touched up top? Seeing as the contact was only on one side of the pistons. The piston protusion may be ok then and not the real culprit?
 
Last edited:

2wd_Sled_Puller

Heavy Equiment mechanic
Feb 19, 2008
1,356
0
0
Florida
Lately Ive felt like giving the whole Diesel thing away. But I hope I dont.

Please dont mick You have made the duramax world just go frecking wild with that red truck of yours. We still wanna see you driving them duramax's. Please remember if u do though im looking for a truck to get
 

Mike

hmmm....
Feb 17, 2007
2,184
0
36
San Angelo, TX
So it seems if the piston was tighter in the hole and not allowed to "rock", then maybe it wouldnt have touched up top? Seeing as the contact was only on one side of the pistons. The piston protusion may be ok then and not the real culprit?

I bet protrusion is still too great. Otherwise, the whole piston top wouldn't be seen on the head.
 

Mike

hmmm....
Feb 17, 2007
2,184
0
36
San Angelo, TX
Looks like Wade and Steve made a point regarding the piston to wall clearance. Just maybe the clearance is correct had the pistons not hit the head ( beating on the skirts ). So, how would one go about checking the deck height to see if the pistons hit at an angle due to the block deck procedure? What else could cause this weird piston to cylinder head impact. Pistons hit more on one side ( exhaust ) than the other side ( intake )? Could we measure the pistons to see if they were chucked up " maybe " crooked in the lathe or mill? Not to say this shouldn't have been caught but??? ideas? Here's a couple of rod bearing pictures, Main bearing pictures to come.
 

Attachments

  • Mick Curtis disassembly 0025.jpg
    Mick Curtis disassembly 0025.jpg
    77.1 KB · Views: 22
  • Mick Curis disassembly 0027.JPG
    Mick Curis disassembly 0027.JPG
    330.7 KB · Views: 26
Last edited:
Jun 28, 2007
3,259
0
0
NE Pa
Looks like Wade and Steve made a point regarding the piston to wall clearance. Just maybe the clearance is correct had the pistons not hit the head ( beating on the skirts ). So, how would one go about checking the deck height to see if the pistons hit at an angle due to the block deck procedure? What else could cause this weird piston to cylinder head impact. Pistons hit more on one side ( exhaust ) than the other side ( intake )? Could we measure the pistons to see if they were chucked up " maybe " crooked in the lathe or mill? Not to say this shouldn't have been caught but??? ideas? Here's a couple of rod bearing pictures, Main bearing pictures to come.

Machinest square and feeler gauge. Or chuck it up in a lathe (with soft jaws) and indicate it in off the ouside and then run an indicator on the face. If they are cut that cockeyed that they hit you should be able to see it with a framing square:spit: Either way they shouldn't be that close. And as far as checking they when they are cocked in the block.....just shim the top and then shim the bottom 180 off.
 
Jun 28, 2007
3,259
0
0
NE Pa
The pistons were installed in the correct direction....right? If not I would guess that could cause they to run cockeyed in the bore.
 

Mike

hmmm....
Feb 17, 2007
2,184
0
36
San Angelo, TX
I guess it would be hard to tell what the intended piston mill would be, but what about the deck height, could it be off?


EDIT: Duhh.... I got you now Paul. Would be rough measurement wouldn't it. Framing square, I'll tell you the high tech tools on the market today. lol
 
Last edited:
Jun 28, 2007
3,259
0
0
NE Pa
I guess it would be hard to tell what the intended piston mill would be, but what about the deck height, could it be off?


EDIT: Duhh.... I got you now Paul. Would be rough measurement wouldn't it. Framing square, I'll tell you the high tech tools on the market today. lol

I was saying if they were really far off a framing square would show you:D

1/2 stroke + rod length + compression heigth

Measuring deck heigth can be a little tricky without machining a bar to go in the mains to measure off of. I know a couple ways to get by without one but it would take me half the night to try and type it out. If you want to know shoot me a PM and I'll give you a call some time.

One of the following has to be wrong.
-crank was offset ground and has more stroke
-rods are long
-compression heigth is too high on pistons
-block deck is too low
-or if the bearings are shot and have tons of slop that can cause piston the head contact
 
Last edited:

Mike

hmmm....
Feb 17, 2007
2,184
0
36
San Angelo, TX
I was saying if they were really far off a framing square would show you:D

1/2 stroke + rod length + compression heigth

Measuring deck heigth can be a little tricky without machining a bar to go in the mains to measure off of. I know a couple ways to get by without one but it would take me half the night to try and type it out. If you want to know shoot me a PM and I'll give you a call some time.

We'll see how it goes, Thanks

One of the following has to be wrong.
-crank was offset ground and has more stroke Hmmm... Would it have standard rod bearings?
-rods are long Would be a manufacture thing, these are produce in runs as I understand.
-compression heigth is too high on pistons could be, just say these are infact correct. What clearance would be required for 15.0 or 15.5 to 1 cr
-block deck is too low And would have to be angle milled ( use )
-or if the bearings are shot and have tons of slop that can cause piston So far, bearings seem good but not mic'd
the head contact
Would have a triple knock :baby:
 
Jun 28, 2007
3,259
0
0
NE Pa
One of the following has to be wrong.
-crank was offset ground and has more stroke Hmmm... Would it have standard rod bearings?
Not unless it was welded

-rods are long Would be a manufacture thing, these are produce in runs as I understand.
Could be off. I always check rods when I assemble a engine. Mic large and small end end, then take half of each of those 2 measurements and add them. Then mic from inside to inside from large to small end and add. That will give you the rod length

-compression heigth is too high on pistons could be, just say these are infact correct. What clearance would be required for 15.0 or 15.5 to 1 cr

They would have to come from the factory too long. I'm not sure what the heigth would be for 15 to 1 I would have to know bowl volume and a few other things to do the math

-block deck is too low And would have to be angle milled ( use )

What? your saying you think they angle milled the block:confused:

-or if the bearings are shot and have tons of slop that can cause piston So far, bearings seem good but not mic'd
the head contact
 

Mike

hmmm....
Feb 17, 2007
2,184
0
36
San Angelo, TX
One of the following has to be wrong.
-crank was offset ground and has more stroke Hmmm... Would it have standard rod bearings?
Not unless it was welded

-rods are long Would be a manufacture thing, these are produce in runs as I understand.
Could be off. I always check rods when I assemble a engine. Mic large and small end end, then take half of each of those 2 measurements and add them. Then mic from inside to inside from large to small end and add. That will give you the rod length

-compression heigth is too high on pistons could be, just say these are infact correct. What clearance would be required for 15.0 or 15.5 to 1 cr

They would have to come from the factory too long. I'm not sure what the heigth would be for 15 to 1 I would have to know bowl volume and a few other things to do the math

-block deck is too low And would have to be angle milled ( use )

What? your saying you think they angle milled the block:confused:

-or if the bearings are shot and have tons of slop that can cause piston So far, bearings seem good but not mic'd
the head contact

No but maybe by mistake?
 

LBZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
Jul 2, 2007
9,903
149
63
46
B.C.
I thought those rods had special bearings for the center oil lubrication hole and you cannot use the stock GM ones?

Simon's Cunningham's are like this.