Change the valve train bolts (5 on each side) as well with at least some grade 8 bolts too when going to the better valve springs. I believe the full open pressure is almost twices the stocker pressure.
Good Call!
This is interesting. Here is what I - a person just looking in from the outside and not actually building anything - see going on here. There is very little difference in what a person does to their engine whether they are going for mild or wild. Either way you seem to do rods (same rods either way so no cost difference), pistons (kinda limited on choices so what you do for one, you likely do for the other type of build and thereagain, no difference in price), heavy duty valvetrain (springs, pushrods, etc.), cam and crank keyed. Only way to "skimp" for a lesser build is the cam and heads for which you would run stockers versus modified units. I suppose if you ran a big lift cam, you may have to do a little more to your pistons for valve clearance otherwise, all else the same? Am I seeing it right? Cam and heads are the only real difference between mild and wild engine builds? Then of course what size charger(s) you strap on the thing (not really a whole lot of cost difference in the overall scheme of things whether you run a 2.5, 2.8 or twins) and how much fuel you want to push at it (single or dual CP3).
C-ya
I agree with that. Basicly it comes down to the engine was well designed. What ever spec they shot for as a output vs. fatuige they did a great job. The limits of the OEM components are reached at basicly the same power level across the board.