Must have been a 6.7 cummins cause as far as i know 5.9's never had VGT's on them.
my bad, must have had some of the details mixed around, i generally dont pay a lot of attention to cummins particulars :rofl:
Must have been a 6.7 cummins cause as far as i know 5.9's never had VGT's on them.
So how did h&s pull out over 800rwhp out of a 6.7 then? I've heard both sides of the story, that they aren't good for much over 500hp and that they're good for much more than that.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
So how did h&s pull out over 800rwhp out of a 6.7 then? I've heard both sides of the story, that they aren't good for much over 500hp and that they're good for much more than that.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
wow never heard about the 6.7 cummins being weak always figured they followed in the 5.9s foot steps of being pretty tough
Must have been a 6.7 cummins cause as far as i know 5.9's never had VGT's on them.
wow never heard about the 6.7 cummins being weak always figured they followed in the 5.9s foot steps of being pretty tough
Correct, 5.9 never did have a VNT, only 6.7
12 and 24v rods are good for north of 1k.
CR rods start getting iffy around 9-1000. Some push them over 1k but it's really only a matter of time before they bend.
6.7 has steeper rod angles than the 5.9, due to the longer stroke. 6.7 rods, I really wouldn't push them more than about 800hp before I went billet. Anything over that, especially running compounds, it's going to get messy and expensive REAL quick.