No it’s pretty cut and dry. Shoot down an FAA registered aircraft and you get a nice fine and possible jail time. I don’t think people should hover over houses but I don’t need anyone’s permission to fly over their house in class G airspace.
People are so ignorant when it comes to drones it’s funny. OMG someone is looking at me! Consumer level drones don’t have zoom capability so for the operator to be spying they would have to be pretty damn close to you. If someone is hovering over you with a $10,000 commercial rig they’re just an asshole. Lol.
You may have forgotten that class G airspace isn't controlled by the FAA. Local states and counties make their regulations for this "uncontrolled" airspace
FAA hasn't made any laws regarding drones over private property but some states have. So once again it is not cut and dry. Know your local laws before flying.
I think many judges and courts would side with the property owner if the drone operator couldn't show valid evidence or reasining for flying closely over another's property without the property owners premission.
Just look at United States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256 court case
"In 1946, the landmark case, United States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256 (1946), the Supreme Court issued foundational guidance as to what extent private property owners actually own and may control airspace over their property."
"the Court addressed the seminal issue as to property invasion, trespass and occupation by flying at low-altitude in airspace over their property. The Court stated that landowners have “exclusive control of the immediate reaches of the enveloping atmosphere,” and that “the landowner owns at least as much of the space above the ground as they can occupy or use in connection with the land"