The one thing I tell guys that ask me about the Batmo wheel is that you have to consider the design of the wheel beyond the fancy curvy blades. The Bat is typically a 6 blade borg based billet design. A 6 blade design is great for low pressure volume, thats why testing of a cast S366 7 blade wheel vs a Billet 6 blade, spools or feels stronger in the low end despite the wheels weighing nearly the same. Essentially its getting more air (quantifiable volume) with less RPM and boost, which equates to more torque, which makes the seat of the pants dyno, feel a gain in the driving experience.
The drop in replacemets: Take Dustins Dyno results for example. An LLY is already a 63.5mm Inducer, 11 blade design. The entire school of thought and reasoning for VNT technology is to create pressure for the emissions equipment to work properly. VNT to make drive pressure down low to push Exhaust gas through the cooler and such, to pass emissions standards. 11 blade design essentially because its quiet. The Stock compressor with an upgraded turbine is capable of supporting 615+ RWHP. In Dustins case the Stock vs Bat was limited by a stock turbine wheel. So by ditching the 11 blade wheel, and going to a 6 blade design he gained volumetric air flow, which equats to more HP and TQ.
In Dustin's case, did the Batmo wheel work? Absolutely! Is that the same kind of results for every application? Absolutely not. On a 6.7 Cummins; which is a 60mm Holset 7 Blade design vs a 60mm 6 blade Batmo replacement the gains seen were negligable.
So... Is the Batmo wheel a good upgrade for some applications? I think so. Is it meanest baddest thing since sliced bread? I think thats yet to be determined.
Caleb