I know so little about EFILive its just not funny. To that end, Id like to ask you guys to look at the following four tables, and give me your opinions about what would happen if this tune was run at the strip.
Last edited:
A question.
- Thread starter TheBac
- Start date
the only thing I would change is the lower left hand side of the PW Table I would imagine that smokes like crazy. But maybe for the track it wouldnt matter since thats more in the lower rpm's 
and depending on what the actual timing table looks like thats kinda high timing
and depending on what the actual timing table looks like thats kinda high timing
Last edited:
Well Tom in my opinion thats a tune of fuel in the low rpms on your throttle base table. Alot of fuel in your your first tabel you posted also. To much fuel down low and with too much timing it's a recipe for bad things to happen to a stock motor. I wouldn't run that tune without changing those tables I'm talking about. Looks like a good dyno tune to get peak numbers down low though No real good reason to have that much going on in the low rpms unless it's on a dyno.
No real good reason to have that much going on in the low rpms unless it's on a dyno.
Last edited:
the only thing I would change is the lower left hand side of the PW Table I would imagine that smokes like crazy. But maybe for the track it wouldnt matter since thats more in the lower rpm's
which table would that be? I can look it up.
Im just curious and wanted some pros to give me their opinion. Thanks.
I wouldn't run it unless you want to damage your engine. There is too much timing way to soon. The amount of fuel that low would not be an advantage either. The reason EFI live is so successful is the ability to get all the right things in all the right places.
You wanna bet? Seriously, which table is it? This is not a tune being sold to the public, so I have no issue whatsoever posting the info.
Last edited:
that timimg tabe is the max timimg the ecm will allow, its over rules all the multipliers, timing adders and timing base x tables.
33 is alot of timimng, but given the amount of pulsewtdth that puts about 55% of the injector pulse before TDC (on paper) at 3200 rpms.
but i dont know if the actual calculated timing is 33* on the timing tables
Last edited:
Ok, I think this is what you guys mean by the "actual timing" table, "B0910 Injection Timing Base C":
Last edited:
well at 2800 rpms. if you can hold 160mpa with a 3034uS pulewidth (assuming pilot is off)
ur 27.4 degres of timing will put about 53% of the injector pulse before TDC on paper.
personally i have ran tunes before with simmilar demands
ur 27.4 degres of timing will put about 53% of the injector pulse before TDC on paper.
personally i have ran tunes before with simmilar demands
Last edited:
The truck shifted at 3250rpm, if that matters.
I wish I understood how these tables all work together. One timing table works here, another works here, this works there, etc....
Just so you know, these are tables are from the tune I now call the "LB7RodBender", and your opinions pretty much mirror what Ive come to figure out. It was much more extreme than my normal Dmaxtuner "12.40" tune and I didnt know just how much more it was. No, its not one of Nicks tunes. It is not sold anywhere, either.
I wish I understood how these tables all work together. One timing table works here, another works here, this works there, etc....
Just so you know, these are tables are from the tune I now call the "LB7RodBender", and your opinions pretty much mirror what Ive come to figure out. It was much more extreme than my normal Dmaxtuner "12.40" tune and I didnt know just how much more it was. No, its not one of Nicks tunes. It is not sold anywhere, either.
Last edited:
yeah, i run a lot less timing now. i still experiment with stuff, timing i play around with a lot ever since josh h made that timing calc it makes it easier to make it my tables
the truck shifted at 3250rpm, if that matters.
I wish i understood how these tables all work together. One timing table works here, another works here, this works there, etc....
Just so you know, these are tables are from the tune i now call the "lb7rodbender", and your opinions pretty much mirror what ive come to figure out. It was much more extreme than my normal dmaxtuner "12.40" tune and i didnt know about it.
thats what i"m talking about!
