12.1 @ 116 :d

paint94979

paint94979

Beer Nazi
Sep 18, 2006
11,715
8
38
37
Not sure what i can do... with the GT4094 my numbers match almost exact to the S475, i think my best ever on the 4094 was a 4.97 330' 7.71 1/8th 12.10 1/4. I drop a tenth on my 60' on my second pass and only picked up .03 on the 330'? Not sure if my CP3 is the issue? as the truck pulls on the top end but no matter what i try 1/8th ET stays near identical, me and everyone else that has helped me agreed i should have seen some change slower or faster none the less a change. Engine runs great, no leaks, nothing that jumps out. Im sure i can work on my 60' as i am still trying to leave at the right boost... It's getting down right ridiculous BTW trans shifts good

#1

60' - 1.798
330' - 5.050
660' - 7.777 @ 91.409
1000' - 10.151
1320' - 12.145 @ 116.080

#2

60' - 1.696
330' - 4.978
660' - 7.727 @ 90.969
1000' - 10.113
1320' - 12.113 @115.774
 
Last edited:
Righteyeblind

Righteyeblind

Member
Aug 29, 2008
712
0
16
Fairbanks, AK
That charger isnt going to have the bottom end your 40 had so 1/8th mile is probably going to be slower but fly in the top. Thats what I saw with my 472 and now my twins mph is lower but et is down and 1/8th mile is way down.
NOt as much torque as your 40 either im sure.
Congrats on the times though. Holy MPH for sure though!
 
paint94979

paint94979

Beer Nazi
Sep 18, 2006
11,715
8
38
37
Righteyeblind said:
That charger isnt going to have the bottom end your 40 had so 1/8th mile is probably going to be slower but fly in the top. Thats what I saw with my 472 and now my twins mph is lower but et is down and 1/8th mile is way down.
NOt as much torque as your 40 either im sure.
Congrats on the times though. Holy MPH for sure though!
Click to expand...

I ran 7.7's with the 4094 and 7.7's with an S475 that isn't right you're saying that the S475 shouldn't give me anymore power on the bottom end over the 4094?... now i have to throw Dual CP3's at it:mad:
 
Last edited:
gmduramax

gmduramax

Shits broke
Jun 12, 2008
4,072
248
63
Nor cal
It wont get any faster with Dual CP3's. I would try more timing, RPM, and pulse. or injectors.
You ever get your converter to lock?
 
Last edited:
paint94979

paint94979

Beer Nazi
Sep 18, 2006
11,715
8
38
37
pressure between shifts drops and recovery time is shit... it holds 26k in 5th but lacks power in all other gears, that is why the CP3 is suspect
 
Righteyeblind

Righteyeblind

Member
Aug 29, 2008
712
0
16
Fairbanks, AK
Yeah my 4094 was way better on torque then my 472. My 472 tq curve was short. 4094 was a lot longer. I can't imagine what it looks like with my twins. Log converter lock up. That was an issue with mine.
 
RPM Motorsports

RPM Motorsports

smokinum
May 13, 2008
3,271
10
38
Central Valley Ca.
Nick Tried to call you this week and missed your return call. We are headed to Sac. wed. to get a customers LMM hopefully into the 12's. Can you make it? Last outting he went 13.4 on a tune, trans, stock TCM tune, 8" of lift, straight front axle, cutting 1.9 60's ;). With some fine tuning/setup and a TCM tune, it can be done... He might want your Itty Bitty's and PYO's as well!
 
Last edited:
Chevy1925

Chevy1925

don't know sh!t about IFS
Staff member
Oct 21, 2009
21,670
5,818
113
Phoenix Az
boy nick, all that jokin about not beatin your 12.1 or hittin the same time with the new charger came true! that jsut no fun!


You got a log of what its doin throughout the gears no tholding rail pressure like your sayin?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom