Burst my bubble? hardly...
Lets see, you basicly confirmed what i said about the crank, rods and pistons, however, you stated thy are all aluminium blocks, but you can get them in iron blocks, all the trucks had iron, and iirc, the 4.8 only comes in an iron block? the archetecture between the iron and aluminium blocks is nearly identical, and parts overlap
you were right about the L92 heads not making the 6.0L iron block a 6.2L, however, the L92 head does lower the cr on the 6.0L cuz they were meant to cover a 4.125" bore(therefor having more cc's available in the head itself, i remember it bein between 18-22cc's depending on the gasket used?) and the 6.0L is only 4.025, i think maybe it was 4 even, icr. which is why you brought up the shrouding issue, but the swap can be done and is done regurlarly.
I never said anything about a 1000hp LS engine on 36lb injectors and a single turbo, I was simply stating that, that set up on just about any size LS woud be a credible street machine with good street manners, and daily drive friendly, i had a similar set up on my last truck, it was a procharged 6.0L in a 1500hd with 36lb injectors, it was a pretty quick truck, and that set up or a turbo set up in a vette, camaro, or firebird even a lighter truck would be sweet
wow, you think the LS7 7.0 is the "worst engine ever made" ? hardly.
yes there have been some issues with it, they had some machineing issues in the head, in the valve guide, a specific one spot, it creates louder valvetrain noise and will eventually lead to failure, they are in the process of a recall being issued, but have not gone to red alert cuz they have had great success identifying the affected vehicles, and are covering the repair 100%, other than that, i and many others consider the LS7 to be legendary enough to put into the Z06, and i guess so did GM, so please enlighten me and everyone else as to why "you" consider the LS7 the worst engine ever made
as for your last comment:spit:, apples to oranges man, you cant compare them in any facit, to try is foolish. 1) the dmax is a diesel...2) the dmax comes as a turbo charged engine, and is like 2x the cost to begin with....3) the duramax engine @ 100K miles is just getting broken in and doubling the horse power output is not really huge concern if done right, and can almost be done with just a tune, an LS engine is starting to break down @ 100k miles and doubling the power output is far more indepth and more expensive than just a efi live tune, and it will never tow like a dmax and wont last half as long
looking at your screen name i assume you have a 6.0L stroker(iron block if you are as smart as you think, not sure what came in the ss trailblazer) making a displacement of '408'ci, so you are in the LS game right now? so all your info is fresh, i have not even thought about an LS engine in 4years, the most thought i have put into one is buying a vette knowing some variant of an LS is going to be under the hood....so thanks for correcting me and "bursting my bubble" but really all you did was back up what i was "trying" to say with more/better info:thumb: