0-60 time

beach_33

Member
Feb 18, 2008
704
0
16
des moines, IA
i usually watch my boost gauge and leave by that. i did take a look at the rpm's and i launched at about 2200 rpm's. i think i could do better
 

TheBac

Why do I keep doing this?
Staff member
Apr 19, 2008
15,599
1,848
113
Mid Michigan
4.10 on the 12.46 run last week, boosted launch.

Other runs were in the 4.25-4.31 area
 
Last edited:

MAXLLY

No Lemming Here
Aug 15, 2007
1,063
0
0
San Diego
tried a little 4x 3lb launch, 0-60 was in the 4.3 range last log i have. But she spins well into 3rd and has 3 huge defuels. She could stand to shift later
 

[email protected]

cmitchell17
Sep 8, 2008
251
0
0
5.1 with a ~500RW tune leaving at 5psi no wheelspin. Timed with a stop watch and got 5.2 something so I guess its close. Also rail pressure was dropping into the 18k 19k and on my tune I have lowered pw when pressure drops so its more like a 425-450rw tune.
 
Last edited:

camcojb

New member
Dec 10, 2007
116
0
0
4.39 0-60mph.

thats with a 13.02 1/4 run. 4x4 boosted.

geez. I need to try lowering the t bars and clamping the springs. In full street trim and high pressure in the tires the best I've seen was 4.50, and that was with 12.70's at 108 in the 1/4.

Jody
 

MMLMM

Tunergeek
Mar 2, 2008
4,086
2
38
43
Reno, NV
www.dyncal.com
geez. I need to try lowering the t bars and clamping the springs. In full street trim and high pressure in the tires the best I've seen was 4.50, and that was with 12.70's at 108 in the 1/4.

Jody

dont worry jody, on the street I had a log, and it was with the 13.02 tune, light boosted launch was 4.58.
 

camcojb

New member
Dec 10, 2007
116
0
0
it says my 0-60 was 3.55... my 60' is 1.64 and my 1/4 is 12.32...

One of my 12.3 runs is 3.59 - not too shabby.

you guys sure it wasn't 4.50's? Mine runs 4.50 or so and went 12.70's at 108+ mph. You guys are hitting 0-60 a full second quicker yet are only .4 quicker at the end, and the mph in both cases is the same as what I ran. And in my case it was a stock turbo, no nitrous, etc. So for you to be 1 second quicker on the front side I would have had to beat you by .6 on the 60-108 mph part, which isn't likely since you both run bigger turbos.

Seems too quick to me. Not calling bs by any means but the numbers don't add up.

Jody
 
Last edited:

MMLMM

Tunergeek
Mar 2, 2008
4,086
2
38
43
Reno, NV
www.dyncal.com
you guys sure it wasn't 4.50's? Mine runs 4.50 or so and went 12.70's at 108+ mph. You guys are hitting 0-60 a full second quicker yet are only .4 quicker at the end, and the mph in both cases is the same as what I ran. And in my case it was a stock turbo, no nitrous, etc. So for you to be 1 second quicker on the front side I would have had to beat you by .6 on the 60-108 mph part, which isn't likely since you both run bigger turbos.

Seems too quick to me. Not calling bs by any means but the numbers don't add up.

Jody


Jody, looks like there numbers are coming from that calculator posted, which was way off for every run I put in it.....
 

TrentNell

Finally underway !!!!!
Jul 7, 2008
7,543
0
0
44
slc tuah
dont know , i logged a 4.18 at the track last night and it defuled till 17 mph becaused i screwed up the tune . i will post a log .
 
Last edited:

TrentNell

Finally underway !!!!!
Jul 7, 2008
7,543
0
0
44
slc tuah
here is that log 4.21 log .... 12.24 @ 114.** 1.9 60 because of the defuel you will see in the log till 17 mph .
 

Attachments

  • DRAG STRIP 1.zip
    31.1 KB · Views: 10
Last edited: