Switching to LBZ controls?

Cougar281

Well-known member
Sep 11, 2006
1,755
214
63
St Louis, MO
I know the day is going to come that I either want or need to rebuild my motor. I'd plan on using an LBZ Block to start, but the main question is would there be any drawbacks to switching all the engine electronics over to those LBZ? Obviously, I'd need to change the injectors, glow plugs, LBZ ECM, TCM & GPCM, get all the harnesses off the truck (for the TC, Transmission, TCM, ECM, engine connectors), probably would need to use LBZ heads (LBZ injectors won't fit in LLY heads, right?). With DSP in the future from EFILive, I can't think of any disadvantages. The LBZ's are smoother, quieter, I'd get a properly working 6 speed Allison and tap-shift, etc. Just looking for opinions at the moment. I may start collecting parts down the road to prepare for the inevitable.
 

Tacojedbob7

<====Ron Jeremy
Nov 25, 2007
55
0
0
I know the day is going to come that I either want or need to rebuild my motor. I'd plan on using an LBZ Block to start, but the main question is would there be any drawbacks to switching all the engine electronics over to those LBZ? Obviously, I'd need to change the injectors, glow plugs, LBZ ECM, TCM & GPCM, get all the harnesses off the truck (for the TC, Transmission, TCM, ECM, engine connectors), probably would need to use LBZ heads (LBZ injectors won't fit in LLY heads, right?). With DSP in the future from EFILive, I can't think of any disadvantages. The LBZ's are smoother, quieter, I'd get a properly working 6 speed Allison and tap-shift, etc. Just looking for opinions at the moment. I may start collecting parts down the road to prepare for the inevitable.

IIRC Guy said LBZ injectors would work with LLY heads with little machine work...i think the LBZ injectors are larger in diameter.
 
Last edited:

duratothemax

<--- slippery roads
Aug 28, 2006
7,139
10
0
Wyoming
If EFILive had DSP for the LBZ, I would have considered making mine into an LBZ when I rebuilt it.

DSP is worth that much to me I guess, even though my truck stays in the little tune 98% of the time.
 

Cougar281

Well-known member
Sep 11, 2006
1,755
214
63
St Louis, MO
Well, Rick made an LB7 into an LLY, so I don't think that making an LLY a LBZ would be much more difficult, considering the main differences between the LLY and LBZ trucks (electronics wise) are under the hood (addition of GMLAN between the modules). By getting an entire harness from a doaner truck, in theory, there should only be a handfull of wires that would need to be spliced; Class2, +12, ground and GMLAN come to mind. Now switching an LLY (or even LBZ) to LMM would be a whole different story (IE Replace EVERYTHING electronic in the whole truck).

The whole point is I don't want to buy a "new" truck... I like my truck and would rather take the time, energy, blood, sweat and money to make it better. I've already got a 6 speed VB and 06 cluster in my truck, so that's two items down.

If or when I get another truck, it won't be to replace the one I have, but to supplement it as a Badd-A$$ High HP pulling and/or racing truck. My plans for this truck don't go too far past 550RWHP. Maybe 600. I'd like to rebuild the motor so it can reliably run that power.
 
Last edited:

GMC_2002_Dmax

The Still Master
Good Luck with the swap,

I have done a few conversions in my day and motor swaps are easy, it's getting all the little parts that end up costing you.

When you start tracing down complete motors/transmission/harness's and then retrofit them a few wires can drive you crazy, maybe it will be a breeze for you, but for me, it is trade up or stick with what I have.

;)
 

Cougar281

Well-known member
Sep 11, 2006
1,755
214
63
St Louis, MO
When you start tracing down complete motors/transmission/harness's and then retrofit them a few wires can drive you crazy, maybe it will be a breeze for you, but for me, it is trade up or stick with what I have.

;)

Well, I've already done a PCM swap that people said couldn't be done (I swapped a 96/97 harness and PCM into my 95 Cougar which required a bit of schematic studying and prepwork, as well as a dozen or so extra wires in the dash harness), so I suspect that with complete harnesses, a LLY to LBZ should be no harder... In theory. If/when I go for it, it will probably be when I do a motor rebuild since the LBZ injectors won't just drop into LLY heads.
 

Cougar281

Well-known member
Sep 11, 2006
1,755
214
63
St Louis, MO
I was looking at the tunes and noticed on benefit in particular is the LBZ ECM is capable of reading up to 105lb/min MAF airflow, whereas the LLY can only go up to 66lb/min. I recall reading that some are pegging the MAF on the LLY's with Cheetah's.
 

Cougar281

Well-known member
Sep 11, 2006
1,755
214
63
St Louis, MO
How is that a benefit to performance?

Not so sure it's a huge performance benefit, but if you're moving say 90lb/min of air, if the MAF can only read 66lb/min, I would think that might throw off the fueling; Isn't the injected quantity at least somewhat controlled by MAF flow?
 
Last edited:

JoshH

Daggum farm truck
Staff member
Vendor/Sponsor
Feb 14, 2007
13,598
632
113
Texas!!!
I was looking at the tunes and noticed on benefit in particular is the LBZ ECM is capable of reading up to 105lb/min MAF airflow, whereas the LLY can only go up to 66lb/min. I recall reading that some are pegging the MAF on the LLY's with Cheetah's.

I don't think mine reads that high. I'll have to go back and look at some logs, but I want to say it flat lines somewhere around 87 or so.
 

Cougar281

Well-known member
Sep 11, 2006
1,755
214
63
St Louis, MO
I don't think mine reads that high. I'll have to go back and look at some logs, but I want to say it flat lines somewhere around 87 or so.

The stock tune scales up to 77.161367 on the LBZ, but the ECM is capable of reading up to 105.821600, although I'm not sure how you'd rescale the MAF to measure that high. The LLY's ECM is maxed out at 66.
 

JoshH

Daggum farm truck
Staff member
Vendor/Sponsor
Feb 14, 2007
13,598
632
113
Texas!!!
I continued the table out up to the max reading (I guess it's 105), but it would top out at 80 something (like I said earlier, I think it stopped at 87). I guess I didn't really calibrate it exactly, but I don't think the stock sensor is capable of reading that high.