I'd be concerned about spool up on anything T6. I also be the first to admit I don't have the experience to say more than that.
I wouldn't be opposed to changing.
So with having the t4 flange & using an adapter for a t6 that puts the bolts outside of welded on flange?Remote mount would solve all the fitment issues. If you have one made with a T4 flange, you can always run an adapter to try a T6 turbo. You cannot go the other way very easily, though. (T6 flange adapted to T4 charger)
S400 frame turbos the Stainless Diesel 5-blade has so far made the highest horsepower on my engine dyno at 1364hp so that is my turbo of choise in the S400 frame and they do offer it in the Ball bearing Billet cart which is the best of the best combo for those that can afford them. Of the GTX stuff we have engine dyno'd I've never really been impressed with them. If I was going to run a "Garrett" style turbo for big power I would go straight to a Precision Turbo and call it a day because that is what we have seen the best results from.:thumb:
No sir, as a single with with the 96mm turbine in a T6 1.32ar housing!
Too many blades for a primary in a compound setup, their slower turning than run as singleWhat about a S476SX-E with the 96mm turbine? Been eyeballing that one myself for a twin setup.
So with having the t4 flange & using an adapter for a t6 that puts the bolts outside of welded on flange?
IDK if I'm over thinking this but I had thought of doing a remote mount with a plate big enough for a t6 & also also having holes to bolt a t4
Too many blades for a primary in a compound setup, their slower turning than run as single
Save your self some money put a one less blade(than cast) billet wheel in a 475 or 480