Thoughts on fuel pressure and timing for a mileage tune

chevyburnout1

Fixing it till it breaks
Aug 25, 2008
2,368
1
38
Berthoud, CO
60% over's on mine and I put about 50+ miles a day on mine. So far mileage isn't a concern at this time but it will be soon. I'll be interested in what you find out James.
 

sweetdiesel

That's better
Aug 6, 2006
10,390
0
0
52
Thailand
I'd try lower the pressure in the economy areas. To be honest, "I like stock sticks and I cannot lie" ...

Pat

Larry, neens and I use to do this on the ol race tune of urs. We did it to get rid of the cummins rattle and it semed to help? Is is right? We were not engineers so it didn't matter:D
 

SSchmi5519

LLY Cult Leader
Oct 19, 2008
3,387
1
36
Arizona
Will do Pat. I really like your theory about the stock sticks too. that had me quite intrigued

That's how we had it the first time, saw a little increase in mpg by upping the pressure close to stock levels.

I really wish we knew how big those injectors really were, I fear that lowering the pressure is leading to not enough atomization, and the use of more pulse to get the same amount of power to the wheels vs the higher pressure and lower pulse.
 

sweetdiesel

That's better
Aug 6, 2006
10,390
0
0
52
Thailand
That's how we had it the first time, saw a little increase in mpg by upping the pressure close to stock levels.

I really wish we knew how big those injectors really were, I fear that lowering the pressure is leading to not enough atomization, and the use of more pulse to get the same amount of power to the wheels vs the higher pressure and lower pulse.

Watch the exhaust steve then u will know if its atomizing
 

Chevy1925

don't know sh!t about IFS
Staff member
Oct 21, 2009
21,685
5,840
113
Phoenix Az
Nice man. You never hear of guys putting serious miles on a built motor.

henry and i think only one or two other guys on here are the only ones i knew of that actually put a good amount of miles on their built motors. im sure there are plenty of other guys out there that do the same. Personally, id rather keep the miles off her, not for the motor but just cause shes my baby :D. so far i have 15k on this motor in the year and a half ive had it. has yet to be on a tune less than 550hp

I have been wondering if bumping up rail pressure a with lower pulse width would create more heat in the fuel temp aspect.

im sure that will only increase. then a fuel cooler would be needed

To this day I've seen best results from the old mc105 tune slighty modded. I've tuned tuned and retuned my lly for milage and from what I've read in diesel economy paper onSAE and othe internetz don't work in real world! I read a paper saying that iirc 1000* egt produce best burn. This did not work! Low boost also did not work! I talked to zach and a few others while doing this and they noticed the same.

After that I didn't care about my milage and just mild race tunes:D in my lly

Ive only really started into messing with mpg on this pig. on the stock sticks, it didnt take much to average 20mpg on the highway. then i put the twins on and my towing mpg went way up. now its like a whole new realm lol. so far i/we've got it up 2mpg from where i was but i feel there is more left by finalizing some more tables and/or cells. im sure at some point soon ill say "screw it, this is good enough for me" :roflmao:

60% over's on mine and I put about 50+ miles a day on mine. So far mileage isn't a concern at this time but it will be soon. I'll be interested in what you find out James.

For sure! i know anthony is in the hunt for this as well and he and i have been bouncing ideas off each other as well as steve and others out there. im actually surprised ive not found alot more people who have really tried for the best mpg they can get out of bigger injectors


well, or they did and they prefer to keep their info to themselves which i can absolutely respect :)
 

Chevy1925

don't know sh!t about IFS
Staff member
Oct 21, 2009
21,685
5,840
113
Phoenix Az
That's how we had it the first time, saw a little increase in mpg by upping the pressure close to stock levels.

I really wish we knew how big those injectors really were, I fear that lowering the pressure is leading to not enough atomization, and the use of more pulse to get the same amount of power to the wheels vs the higher pressure and lower pulse.

yeah but we f***ked with timing at the same time so it may have hurt our gain a bit. ill pull it back and see if i notice rattle drop out as well, then see how the truck does. towing the zuk to camp verde this weekend on the flat bed so that can give me some kind of idea of what it changes

Have steve build forty some tunas and pull his hair out tweaking....its the only way we can get some knowledge:joker:

hahaha i think he'd show up at my house with blood shot eyes, breatheing heavily in my bedroom window and writing in the condensation on the window "you will die" :D
 

Dozerboy

Well-known member
Jun 23, 2009
4,892
470
83
TX of course
When I was on a quest for mileage (stock sticks) I ran timming up until it started rattle more then I was conferable with then backed it down. Then did the same with RP and after that I started pulling out PW until mileage stopped going up. When I took to much out it drove different too. It took me 2 years or so to really get it as good as I though I could. But my commute would change every few days and then traffic was different every day, so it was a real pain to be consistent. When I really thought I was getting it nailed down I would spend a few hrs one day making the same 50m round trip over and over on different tunes.

IIRC I was running 12* on my LBZ for a while which is way over 100% before TDC
 

gmduramax

Shits broke
Jun 12, 2008
4,073
249
63
Nor cal
I used to get 21mpg on the freeway until I cracked a piston and honed the cylinders. Now I only get 16mpg on the freeway :( but other things could be affected. Maybe I should get my injectors checked. I have 55,000 miles on my built motor in 4 years.
 

Chevy1925

don't know sh!t about IFS
Staff member
Oct 21, 2009
21,685
5,840
113
Phoenix Az
When I was on a quest for mileage (stock sticks) I ran timming up until it started rattle more then I was conferable with then backed it down. Then did the same with RP and after that I started pulling out PW until mileage stopped going up. When I took to much out it drove different too. It took me 2 years or so to really get it as good as I though I could. But my commute would change every few days and then traffic was different every day, so it was a real pain to be consistent. When I really thought I was getting it nailed down I would spend a few hrs one day making the same 50m round trip over and over on different tunes.

IIRC I was running 12* on my LBZ for a while which is way over 100% before TDC

How much pulse did you take out at a time in the cruise area? Dropping 100uS made a noticeable difference in throttle response that we wound up changing back. Maybe 30-50uS decrease wouldn't be as bad?
 

gmduramax

Shits broke
Jun 12, 2008
4,073
249
63
Nor cal
How much pulse did you take out at a time in the cruise area? Dropping 100uS made a noticeable difference in throttle response that we wound up changing back. Maybe 30-50uS decrease wouldn't be as bad?

When I got my best mpg I raised pulse in my tune alot, ran a shit ton of pressure and timing. Only reason I raised pulse was because around 2000rpm the truck would hang like it was starved for fuel. After raising pulse the truck ran great. Smoked alot under acceleration but didn't hang or rattle and got great fuel mileage.
 

gmduramax

Shits broke
Jun 12, 2008
4,073
249
63
Nor cal
When I was on a quest for mileage (stock sticks) I ran timming up until it started rattle more then I was conferable with then backed it down. Then did the same with RP and after that I started pulling out PW until mileage stopped going up. When I took to much out it drove different too. It took me 2 years or so to really get it as good as I though I could. But my commute would change every few days and then traffic was different every day, so it was a real pain to be consistent. When I really thought I was getting it nailed down I would spend a few hrs one day making the same 50m round trip over and over on different tunes.

IIRC I was running 12* on my LBZ for a while which is way over 100% before TDC

I'm not sure if this is accurate but isn't dropping pulse the same as adding timing and fuel pressure. If you drop pulse you have to run higher MM3 to maintain speed. The ECM just picks from the next cell up to get the fuel that's required to run. That and you will be running more pilot.

On my LMM with 100 overs I could add pilot, reduce pilot, raise or lower pilot timing and it wouldn't make a difference, at least one I didn't notice.
 

SickLL7Crenshaw

Billy The Kid
Mar 10, 2013
1,088
34
48
31
Mexico
I dropped PW 50us and running timing around 8* and bumped the fuel pressure up at cruising speeds and got 20.5mpgs this last weekend in my LLY. Better then the 16-17 I was getting lol
 

coker6303

Keep Calm and Chive On!!
Aug 6, 2009
2,484
0
36
40
Houston, TX
My city driving mileage hasn't really changed much, around that 13-14 mpg but the cruising mileage is 16-17 at best. I miss the 20-21mpg I could get fairly easily out of the stock turbo/injectors.

Don't recall towing mileage being any worse, maybe better actually.

I drive 50-150 miles a day so it is adding up for sure. I should probably be driving something different but I love my truck too much! :thumb:

No clue how the tune is set up, that's all in the Doc's department. ;). When JoshH modified tunes it was strictly for driveability. He nailed that part! Responsive and a blast to drive now! :thumb: I guess fuel mileage is a by product that we haven't discussed much.
 

Chevy1925

don't know sh!t about IFS
Staff member
Oct 21, 2009
21,685
5,840
113
Phoenix Az
See i tend to agree with anthony about dropping pw in the cruise area, not about increasing it but how it would react decreasing it. Just adding more pressure, you could see MM3 drop to a lower amount but increasing pressure also increases the amount of fuel put into the cylinder.

im so use to how quite my truck use to be, any little rattle sounds like a lot. maybe i should hop in a stock LB7 and see how they sound again :D


I love my truck too much! :thumb:

thats for damn sure for me as well!
 

McRat

Diesel Hotrodder
Aug 2, 2006
11,249
26
38
64
Norco CA
www.mcratracing.com
Say it takes 20 horsepower to idle the engine at 600rpm.

Once you set the pressure and timing, the engine will only use as many mm3's as it needs to keep it there. Efficiency and mileage is the true mm3's needed to make the needed power.

Ditto is true for freeway cruise. Your goal is to get the true mm3's to their lowest point. You don't need to monitor mileage. You need a stretch of flat road and no wind (morning runs). You make an adjustment and see how many mm3's it takes by averaging a large identical sample (say 5 miles).
 

gmduramax

Shits broke
Jun 12, 2008
4,073
249
63
Nor cal
See i tend to agree with anthony about dropping pw in the cruise area, not about increasing it but how it would react decreasing it. Just adding more pressure, you could see MM3 drop to a lower amount but increasing pressure also increases the amount of fuel put into the cylinder.

im so use to how quite my truck use to be, any little rattle sounds like a lot. maybe i should hop in a stock LB7 and see how they sound again :D




thats for damn sure for me as well!

I had that same problem when I was tuning my moms LLY, I couldn't get the rattle to go away. I put the stock tune back in and realized how loud that it was.