this guy claims 12.2 with no drugs and no weight reduction
- Thread starter pepperidge
- Start date
id say BS as well. Hell i was gettin a 1.9 for a 60ft with a fairly hard launch on 37s. he ought to be way lower than that id think
I have, act rail pressure on the bottom right in magenta
My truck ran a 12.9 at 103 with no track prep, just went to the track after class one day with my friend and ran it how i drive it everyday. weighed in at 7000lbs on a ugly day.
on 33's and bad HG. Wondering how it would run with a good HG and the Ranch hands replaced by stock bumpers and 265's and pyo's and tool box removed.
Attachments
Last edited:
well not stock they dont, the Fuel Pressure Sensor Scaling Table needs to be modified. Table B0203.
Brayden made a post about scaling it up a while back
I really do think a dmax can get into the 11's on stock turbo fuel only, i just been sidelined though, so watch out tom
Last edited:
GMC_2002_Dmax
The Still Master
If you re-scale it it does not mean that it is making the higher pressures, it just means that the actual voltage from the sensor will display the new PHONY NUMBERS based on the scaling that is no longer correct for the sensor.
Nice try, but I have been at this too long to be fooled that easy.
Thanks for the post.
Nice try, but I have been at this too long to be fooled that easy.
Thanks for the post.
well not stock they dont, the Fuel Pressure Sensor Scaling Table needs to be modified. Table B0203.
Brayden made a post about scaling it up a while back
I really do think a dmax can get into the 11's on stock turbo fuel only, i just been sidelined though, so watch out tom
Have you ever considered maybe you don't know everything about tuning?If you re-scale it it does not mean that it is making the higher pressures, it just means that the actual voltage from the sensor will display the new PHONY NUMBERS based on the scaling that is no longer correct for the sensor.
Nice try, but I have been at this too long to be fooled that easy.
Thanks for the post.
Its not a re-scale
If you re-scale it it does not mean that it is making the higher pressures, it just means that the actual voltage from the sensor will display the new PHONY NUMBERS based on the scaling that is no longer correct for the sensor.
Nice try, but I have been at this too long to be fooled that easy.
Thanks for the post.
Last edited:
If you re-scale it it does not mean that it is making the higher pressures, it just means that the actual voltage from the sensor will display the new PHONY NUMBERS based on the scaling that is no longer correct for the sensor.
Nice try, but I have been at this too long to be fooled that easy.
Thanks for the post.
They are not talking about re-scaling the sensor, if you look at the stock B0203 table it flat lines at 4.53 volts and 180 MPa. You can continue it out linearly from 4.53 volts to 5 volts and you'll end up at 201.8 MPa. On my truck even when I do this the sensor still flat lines at 26,852 PSI (185.1 MPa).
GMC_2002_Dmax
The Still Master
NO,
But feel free to correct me again when you think I am wrong.
:thumb:
I would have responded sooner but have been busy traveling for 2 weeks, I guess you don't travel much for tuning, I do quite often, not that it matters to you.
BTW,
The sensor is a 0-5v and the return voltage is scaled to the table listed.
You can extend it to a higher pressure but from 4.53 volts to 5 volts it is listed at 180 mpa. I assume this was done for the simple fact that a stock LB7/LLY won't request more than 160 mpa in the stock fuel pressure base tables.
So I guess you could alter it but you have no idea whether or not the scaling is correct unless you go buy the fact it is scaled in 7 mpa increments.......
............so 202 mpa would be correct scaling at 5v.Have a nice day.
:baby: