Are you sure about that? Maybe I’m misunderstanding what your saying?
I put an LML short block in an LLY years ago and we had to spacer out the accessory brackets to make the belt line up. So I’m a little confused about what your saying.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Na your correct.. Guess I worded that wrong on accessories brackets.
The damper thickness difference is actually to the outside edge, belt rib distance to cover side is identical. See pic above ^. Right is LML. We just didn't have any LML brackets to try at the moment...
Our first thought was also to just space the brackets out to line up with ribs on damper in the new location. Same as you did using LML long block. Would work in a complete engine swap. However I noticed a gap between end of crank and end of damper that bothered me. That's when I noticed GM also machined down the center damper area behind counter weight about the difference of new pump thickness.
We actually bolted up an LML damper just to have a look. End of crank snout was even with damper face where washer meets. But as you can see in pics below, distance between the ATI LBZ damper and a factory LML damper on crank snout is huge..
So if using block, crank, and damper from pre-LML, with LML front cover and pump mod, it would also set the belt out a .180 -.200 and require LML brackets or some spacers. Not recommended because it moves the weight out same distance also.
However,, since ya can't uses the LML damper on LMM internals, only decent option is run a matching damper. According to ATI website, the outer assembly was a different part #. So I ordered that one, but once it arrived it, was identical to LBZ unit we had...
Ok, so last option was, machine down the existing hub, which moved the belt ribs back in LBZ lineup. But it also closed that gap between snout to washer, and more importantly, moves the counterweight weight back to factory location from end of crank.
I'll edit that post above.