Need more tables... Please :)

dmaxfireman

'Can do' kind of guy
Apr 8, 2007
2,329
1
38
CT
hey EFI crew, how do we go about requesting maf and map rescaling tables for the lbz and if it matters, os 6128?

trying to work out a few bugs. and secondly any tables to do with the intake air heater available?

thanks!!!

you guys are the best!!:hug:
 

MMLMM

Tunergeek
Mar 2, 2008
4,086
2
38
43
Reno, NV
www.dyncal.com
hey EFI crew, how do we go about requesting maf and map rescaling tables for the lbz and if it matters, os 6128?

trying to work out a few bugs. and secondly any tables to do with the intake air heater available?

thanks!!!

you guys are the best!!:hug:

un hook IAH and turn the codes off.....:D

yes though it would be nice to just shut that sucker off all the way....
 

dmaxfireman

'Can do' kind of guy
Apr 8, 2007
2,329
1
38
CT
un hook IAH and turn the codes off.....:D

yes though it would be nice to just shut that sucker off all the way....

already did that :) the codes still show up in the background though :( been trying to figure out a way to fool it with resistors and such but still no luck. now i have a damn maf problem that i can't get rid of...... may have a bad sensor now that i think about it, but recal tables would definitly help!!
 

dmaxfireman

'Can do' kind of guy
Apr 8, 2007
2,329
1
38
CT
keep setting p0101. codes are setting while maf is in "ok" range according to efi live tables compared to mastertech scanner (1 step under tech2) sitting at dealer right now to have buddy of mine confirm. gonna try and get a warranty sensor out of LI for tomorrow am. cross fingers that the twins don't deter them from giving me the sensor under warranty :rolleyes:
 

dmaxfireman

'Can do' kind of guy
Apr 8, 2007
2,329
1
38
CT
cleaned sensor earlier and let truck idle and it is setting codes while idling...... not good. not sure exactly how to calibrate the sensor either need some sort of calculation??
 

dmaxfireman

'Can do' kind of guy
Apr 8, 2007
2,329
1
38
CT
c0905-c0908 tables might help. was looking through the lmm os and they have a few more tables than us. wheres the love?!! :angel:
 

dmaxfireman

'Can do' kind of guy
Apr 8, 2007
2,329
1
38
CT
well dealer is giving me a sensor under warranty 8 am tomorrow. hopefully it works!!!! will let everybody know
 

JoshH

Daggum farm truck
Staff member
Vendor/Sponsor
Feb 14, 2007
13,716
779
113
Texas!!!
keep setting p0101. codes are setting while maf is in "ok" range according to efi live tables compared to mastertech scanner (1 step under tech2) sitting at dealer right now to have buddy of mine confirm. gonna try and get a warranty sensor out of LI for tomorrow am. cross fingers that the twins don't deter them from giving me the sensor under warranty :rolleyes:
Go into the MAF Sensor Parameters and make the following changes:

{C0901} P0101 Lower Limit Threshold-0.00
{C0902} P0101 Lower Error Time-655.00
{C0903} P0101 Upper Limit Threshold-105.82
{C0904} P0101 Upper Error Time-655.00
 

dmaxfireman

'Can do' kind of guy
Apr 8, 2007
2,329
1
38
CT
already done that josh. every 15 min code still sets. thats why i think the sensor went bad. sitting in dealer lot right now. buddy is grabbing techII and candi module will update in a few min. thanks cindy and ross!!
 

dmaxfireman

'Can do' kind of guy
Apr 8, 2007
2,329
1
38
CT
damn sensor did not fix it...... anybody know the procedure for testing the maf plug coming from the truck? starting to get pissed...... may get stock air box and mouth piece and hook it up to see if my problem is rooted in the twins. if so oh well gotta deal with the code. if not maybe it will let me find the source.
 

dmaxfireman

'Can do' kind of guy
Apr 8, 2007
2,329
1
38
CT
well, i took a look at an old log i had and compared my maf flow at idle. ( the only constant because i did not have the maf volts pid selected ) and was reading high, by about 20-25%. so i dropped all maf values down by appx 25% and set the error time to 655 seconds. and since have not thrown a code. a temporary fix for now. I want to get it all figured out the right way though.


my theory is that maf sensor actually uses velocity to calculate volume so with a smaller intake tube the velocity is increased to achieve the same volume. so i matched the proper flow to the proper voltage (ie velocity) seems the be working for now. can't wait for the rescaling tables though!! :)