good numbers!
BoiseRob Active member Oct 12, 2007 392 45 28 63 Nov 11, 2008 #22 jrad12381 said: What type of torque were these tunes putting down? Click to expand... IIRC Nathan's was 1127ft/lbs & Rob's was 1201ft/lbs
jrad12381 said: What type of torque were these tunes putting down? Click to expand... IIRC Nathan's was 1127ft/lbs & Rob's was 1201ft/lbs
sweetdiesel That's better Aug 6, 2006 10,390 0 0 52 Thailand Nov 12, 2008 #24 duratothemax said: Do I get any special privileges or title because I have a second set ever made?? Click to expand... Ben if you like we can all refer to you as #2 from now on:joker:
duratothemax said: Do I get any special privileges or title because I have a second set ever made?? Click to expand... Ben if you like we can all refer to you as #2 from now on:joker:
jrad12381 New member May 12, 2008 161 0 0 Reno, NV Nov 13, 2008 #25 BoiseRob said: IIRC Nathan's was 1127ft/lbs & Rob's was 1201ft/lbs Click to expand... Rob do you think the difference in torque numbers is from the 30% over injectors in your truck?
BoiseRob said: IIRC Nathan's was 1127ft/lbs & Rob's was 1201ft/lbs Click to expand... Rob do you think the difference in torque numbers is from the 30% over injectors in your truck?
Ten_Bucks Wears a tinfoil hat Jul 29, 2008 84 0 0 43 Placerville, California www.facebook.com Nov 15, 2008 #27 Man, I REALLY want a set of those twins now. Scott
dieselson Active member Oct 14, 2006 1,544 4 38 30 Huntington Beach, CA Nov 16, 2008 #28 MAn those twins make some nice power, and I imagine the streetability is very good too.