Manifold vs headers

jpowel29

Member
Feb 1, 2008
780
0
16
Bentonville, Arkansas
I believe on sustained, high rpm applications that tubular headers will yield power gains. I’ve not seen any documented power gains between manifolds vs headers on DMax engine.
 

ZeroGravity58

Well-known member
Mar 23, 2008
1,401
51
48
38
Maryland
I believe on sustained, high rpm applications that tubular headers will yield power gains. I’ve not seen any documented power gains between manifolds vs headers on DMax engine.

Has anyone tried to make a longer set of equal length headers? Or would we even have room to fit them? All I see is the log type headers manifolds. I read the article and what caught my eye was the drive pressure difference
 

RickDLance

Active member
Feb 14, 2007
1,276
14
38
We tried "spaghetti" headers a long time ago. Everyone that tried both them and the log headers gave us mixed feedback.
 

Attachments

  • dcp_3180.jpg
    dcp_3180.jpg
    197.3 KB · Views: 102
  • dcp_3191.jpg
    dcp_3191.jpg
    199.6 KB · Views: 100

zakkb787

<that’s not me...
Sep 29, 2014
2,340
52
48
Granite Falls NC
Very enjoyable read thanks for sharing. I’ve always wondered why even “headers” for these trucks were still a manifold style.

Rick, those are sexy and I want them :woott::roflmao: let me go rob a bank.
 

Chevy1925

don't know sh!t about IFS
Staff member
Oct 21, 2009
21,743
5,911
113
Phoenix Az

juddski88

Freedom Diesel
Jul 1, 2008
4,657
120
63
Chesterfield, Mass.
We tried "spaghetti" headers a long time ago. Everyone that tried both them and the log headers gave us mixed feedback.

I own one of the first sets. They've been in multiple trucks and seen a lot of heat. No warping or cracking, and the coating is still perfect. As far as performance, I never got to try them back to back with a quality set of "log" manifolds, but I'm certainly willing to if I can get a set to test cheap enough.
 

Attachments

  • FB_IMG_1568236595537.jpg
    FB_IMG_1568236595537.jpg
    44.8 KB · Views: 79
  • FB_IMG_1568236603924.jpg
    FB_IMG_1568236603924.jpg
    34.9 KB · Views: 68
Last edited:

juddski88

Freedom Diesel
Jul 1, 2008
4,657
120
63
Chesterfield, Mass.
sounds like he did an 8 into 1 (the right way, not the bs way i see guys call it). now THAT makes a significant difference when you line up the cylinder pulses in order.

Here are some pictures of them.
 

Attachments

  • FB_IMG_1568236147375.jpg
    FB_IMG_1568236147375.jpg
    100.5 KB · Views: 96
  • FB_IMG_1568236143638.jpg
    FB_IMG_1568236143638.jpg
    107.4 KB · Views: 95

ZeroGravity58

Well-known member
Mar 23, 2008
1,401
51
48
38
Maryland
If you could even Dyno against a set of regular manifolds. Just looking to see if there is a drive pressure difference and power difference like on the LS motor.
 

juddski88

Freedom Diesel
Jul 1, 2008
4,657
120
63
Chesterfield, Mass.
Undoubtedly a drive pressure difference, but because there are so many variations of long tube headers - different tube volumes, shapes of collectors, flow characteristics, etc. It's hard to rule out much of anything. If you had 3 or 4 designs of headers to compare with 3 or 4 designs of log manifolds, then you could form a generalized opinion of either one
 

valleyduramax

Member
Jul 25, 2010
233
4
18
Ottawa ON Canada
The tubular headers that Randy Overton runs is made by a lad up here in Ontario, Canada. John Gleason is his name. Gleasemanufacturing.com is his website.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
 

ZeroGravity58

Well-known member
Mar 23, 2008
1,401
51
48
38
Maryland
The tubular headers that Randy Overton runs is made by a lad up here in Ontario, Canada. John Gleason is his name. Gleasemanufacturing.com is his website.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

I looked at his Facebook page, I don't even think I could afford to email him! :rofl:
 

RobsDmax

Member
Mar 19, 2012
832
1
16
Arthur, Ontario