Thought I'd update this thread being I found a good place to dyno in kansas city.
I got on the dyno about the 2nd week in November and am still going at it; hoping to get back on Wednesday if I get another wheel in mail tomorrow. I've had 12-14 sessions now with each session doing 5 runs. I've done 10 runs on some sessions being I've changed tuning.
Lowest numbers have been 421hp & 699ft/lbs; highest has been 488hp & 888ft/lbs. My motor is bone stock from the oil pan to the intake runs, stock heads & bolts even. So far she's still in one piece!!:thumb:
I was hoping to brake 500hp & 1000ft/lbs of torque but I don't know if it's going to happen; 500hp seems more attainable then 1000ft/lbs right now.
Thanks for everybody's help, I much appreciate it. Hoping to have my first round of testing done the middle of January.
Yellowchevy
Russell, those numbers seem reasonable. I'd say as long as you go back to the same guy and use the same dyno you'll end up with some useful comparative data. As long as the operator can run the dyno in a repeatable manner it doesn't really matter what the numbers are. This is assuming they can at least build a decent amount of boost.
Thought I'd update this thread being I found a good place to dyno in kansas city.
I got on the dyno about the 2nd week in November and am still going at it; hoping to get back on Wednesday if I get another wheel in mail tomorrow. I've had 12-14 sessions now with each session doing 5 runs. I've done 10 runs on some sessions being I've changed tuning.
Lowest numbers have been 421hp & 699ft/lbs; highest has been 488hp & 888ft/lbs. My motor is bone stock from the oil pan to the intake runs, stock heads & bolts even. So far she's still in one piece!!:thumb:
I was hoping to brake 500hp & 1000ft/lbs of torque but I don't know if it's going to happen; 500hp seems more attainable then 1000ft/lbs right now.
Thanks for everybody's help, I much appreciate it. Hoping to have my first round of testing done the middle of January.
Yellowchevy
This is actually what you need to do regardless of which dyno you use. You need a competent operator that can duplicate runs , hopefully conditions will be close to the same and you have a BASE run prior to any enhancements.
OregonDMAX said:Even though none of this testing is for your truck
clrussell said:Where'd you find a dyno? I've got about 5 trucks we would like to dyno sometime. There's a diesel shop half way to kc that has one. Not sure if it's load or inertia, but I don't really trust the numbers since they want you to spend money with them
jeez you are slacking! who needs a family and job when you have us :roflmao:
I agree. said it was a kory max effort tune, so it should be up there.Maybe I missed something but with a 366, built trans, and max effort tuning you should be in the 550-600 range on that dyno. The range being how hot the tune is and the health of the CP3.
I thought he was testing different wheels for a lb7 turbo?
Maybe I missed something but with a 366, built trans, and max effort tuning you should be in the 550-600 range on that dyno. The range being how hot the tune is and the health of the CP3.
Maybe I missed something but with a 366, built trans, and max effort tuning you should be in the 550-600 range on that dyno. The range being how hot the tune is and the health of the CP3.
Just to clarify so everybody is on the same page. The numbers I posted on 1/5/15 was for the IHI turbo's I've been testing.
My testing/dynoing is for the LB7 IHI in seeing the different characteristics and hp/torque gains of each wheel available for them.
I'm using Kory's tunes with my max effort being 230hp.
It has nothing to do with the S366. At the time I made this thread I had an S366 on my pickup and was considering dynoing it to see how it would do but decided not to.
Sorry for any confusion I may have caused in that updated post, I should have been more clear.
Yellowchevy