Despite what Adam contends about the efficiency of running the high compressions, I do not share that thought. I never recommend higher than 16.5:1 for street.
Why?
What you might gain in a more efficient cycle is overwhelmed by pumping loss and blowby. No two ring style piston is going to hold back those pressures with any efficiency. Keystone or not.
The additional forces on the crank, bearings at any given power level are significant. In short, reducing the longevity of the engine as a whole.
There is a loss due to the increased chamber Temperatures. Fools indication is lower EGTs, but only because the block, head, and piston have absorbed so much of the combustion heat.
Having said that, there is a sweet spot. That is where the rings seal, the chamber temps are in check, the loads on the bearing surfaces are not excessive and you are reasonably high on the Diesel efficiency curve. That spot is not at 17.5:1
Why?
What you might gain in a more efficient cycle is overwhelmed by pumping loss and blowby. No two ring style piston is going to hold back those pressures with any efficiency. Keystone or not.
The additional forces on the crank, bearings at any given power level are significant. In short, reducing the longevity of the engine as a whole.
There is a loss due to the increased chamber Temperatures. Fools indication is lower EGTs, but only because the block, head, and piston have absorbed so much of the combustion heat.
Having said that, there is a sweet spot. That is where the rings seal, the chamber temps are in check, the loads on the bearing surfaces are not excessive and you are reasonably high on the Diesel efficiency curve. That spot is not at 17.5:1