I believe you are correct.
So what is Cummins doing for 2010 anyways, keeping the power/tq the same??
LML Specs released
- Thread starter whitetrash21
- Start date
I believe you are correct.
So what is Cummins doing for 2010 anyways, keeping the power/tq the same??
It doesnt work that way anymore. There is a "WITNESS" test performed by outside SAE engineers to verify the engine makes the numbers on the dyno.
A few possibly dumb questions:
Is it possible to swap transmissions between an LML and a LBZ?
Has there been any talk of EFI supporting the LML yet?
Anybody have any ideas as far as deleting the cat, DPF, EGR, Urea, and whatever else?
Thanks guys. The Denali HD is looking pretty sweet.
Is it possible to swap transmissions between an LML and a LBZ?
Has there been any talk of EFI supporting the LML yet?
Anybody have any ideas as far as deleting the cat, DPF, EGR, Urea, and whatever else?
Thanks guys. The Denali HD is looking pretty sweet.
"not really possible" If I had to guess, because the 2011 allison has a completely different valve body, electronically adjustable main pressure regulator, different clutch apply rates and stuff, and a new torque converter, none of which the 2007-2010 tcm has support for.
EFILive knows NOTHING more about the 2011 dmax and its ECM than we do, the thing wont even be out in the real world for another month and we are already asking this? C'mon give them a break...
Honestly, I wouldnt even ask them even when it does come out, because all that does is annoy them...they have plenty of stuff keeping them busy and things that need to be done first...we all know that when it does come out they WILL look into it at their soonest convenience and tell us whether its possible or not...they dont need any reminders from us.
ben
Last edited:
Anybody have any ideas as far as deleting the cat, DPF, EGR, Urea, and whatever else?
Thanks guys. The Denali HD is looking pretty sweet.
Wait for EFI Live to support the LML then Remove all system components and block things off that need to be.
If the new trucks werent as expensive as a house I'd own one.
Looks like Gm has another good one out.:thumb:
Looks like Gm has another good one out.:thumb:
Some more examples to pop your little bubble:
2000 Mustang Cobra R - 385 HP in the brochure, 379 rwhp on the dyno
2003 Mustang Mach 1 - 305 HP in the brochure, 285 rwhp on the dyno
2003 Mustang Cobra - 390 HP in the brochure, 375 rwhp on the dyno
2011 Mustang GT - 412 HP in the brochure, 377-395 rwhp on the dyno
Good day...
dmaxvaz said:
Only if they opt for a SAE J1349 rating
Only Fags wear the cams in the head:hello:
On edit, the 1989-1995 ZR-1 LT-5 built by Lotus/Mercury Marine was not a fag it was a stud in it's day.
Last edited:
Fixed it for ya:thumb:
While I agree that Fords Mod engines (FYI the modular name comes from the assembly line construction, not the engine itself) generally suck, they built one of the baddest engines ever and it was SOHC. The "Cammer" was rated at 657HP and 575ftlbs strait out of the box in 1964. Not bad IMO.
The single overhead cam motor could make awsome power but reliablitiy was misserable compared to the Hemi's and GM wedges of the day, but yea it was a dominate force in the mid 60's, I know this as a fact as pops used to drive one a quarter mile at a time every friday and saturday night:thumb:
