So I have been thinking of going with another KD lift pump. My question is this- Would it be more of a benefit to run two pumps in parallel sharing a common suction (SoCal P/U) and then going back into the single OEM fuel rail, as opposed to just putting both pumps in series with each other?
My thoughts on why the series set-up may not be the best, is that if the pump closest to the tank does not put out as much as the 2nd pump, it may work against what we are trying to achieve with two pumps. Especially if positive displacement pumps like the PPE and FASS are used as you cannot draw any fuel through them correct?
In parallel it wouldn't matter-as long as the suction side of the pumps could keep up with the demand from two pumps.
I know to fully take advantage of a dual lift pump-parallel setup it would be best to run each on it's own fuel line on both the suction and discharge-but that is not what I am trying to achieve-at least not right now.
The reason this came into my head is with the new higher rpm's that we can get with the LBZ's, I'm wondering if we may have a harder time maintaining the supply to the CP3 at these higher rpm's. It wasn't an issue when it defueled at 3300rpm!! This may also be helpful thinking for those running dual CP3's.
I'm just looking for your thoughts here and let me know if I am out to lunch on this thinking!
Thanks to all!!
Dale
My thoughts on why the series set-up may not be the best, is that if the pump closest to the tank does not put out as much as the 2nd pump, it may work against what we are trying to achieve with two pumps. Especially if positive displacement pumps like the PPE and FASS are used as you cannot draw any fuel through them correct?
In parallel it wouldn't matter-as long as the suction side of the pumps could keep up with the demand from two pumps.
I know to fully take advantage of a dual lift pump-parallel setup it would be best to run each on it's own fuel line on both the suction and discharge-but that is not what I am trying to achieve-at least not right now.
The reason this came into my head is with the new higher rpm's that we can get with the LBZ's, I'm wondering if we may have a harder time maintaining the supply to the CP3 at these higher rpm's. It wasn't an issue when it defueled at 3300rpm!! This may also be helpful thinking for those running dual CP3's.
I'm just looking for your thoughts here and let me know if I am out to lunch on this thinking!
Thanks to all!!
Dale
Last edited: