the lml is 16:1, but the van engine is 16.8:1. Also, i had a conversation last wk with one of the engineers and he still thinks that the pistons will crack at twice the hp rating.all of the lml short block parts *should* interchange with all previous gen dmax short block parts...all of the basic dimensions stayed the same, so i see no reason why you couldnt try some lml pistons in a lb7/lly/lbz/lmm built motor and see how they hold up...
Cr is down a bit too on the lml, i think its now 16.0:1?? Or at least thats what some of the documents said....
the lml is 16:1, but the van engine is 16.8:1. Also, i had a conversation last wk with one of the engineers and he still thinks that the pistons will crack at twice the hp rating.
hopefully! whats nice is they are 16:1 meaning no machining needed during buildsI know this is a million dollar question, but I would be plenty happy if they were as strong or stronger than LB7/LLY pistons...
anything is better than LBZ pistons.
the lml is 16:1, but the van engine is 16.8:1. Also, i had a conversation last wk with one of the engineers and he still thinks that the pistons will crack at twice the hp rating.
But did he hold the same opinion of the LB7/LLY pistons ?the lml is 16:1, but the van engine is 16.8:1. Also, i had a conversation last wk with one of the engineers and he still thinks that the pistons will crack at twice the hp rating.
(400+-)x2 is still over 800. The LBZ aren't doing that.
i was informed this afternoon (by somebody who had pulled apart a lml) that lml pistons will not fit lbz rods without machining.
Theres the question.But would the piston/rod combo fit an LBZ crank ?