Well ya know what, the reality of the situation is that there are always going to be bad drivers out there. I agree with this sentiment ("we shouldnt need to rely on technology, we should just be better drivers"), but I also disagree with it...heres why. No one is a perfect driver (or at least as good as you), so we gotta work with what we have. If a piece of technology can stop someone from veering into my lane and causing an accident, whether or not the driver in question sucks, fell asleep, or whatever...IDGAF. The reality of the situation is, the technology averted the accident. Thats what matters.
Is it dumb that we need to rely on technology to keep the bad drivers safe? Yeah sure, I guess, but again, some people just suck....and theres no changing that. Its not like we can screen out the shitty drivers and say "ok...you're fine...you're fine...no, you're not fine, hand over your license", so the best we can do is give the idiots a helmet and electronic training wheels...so be it. If thats what it takes to lower accident rates, than who cares!
Yes good luck with using your ADF and VOR (those exist still? I thought VOR stations were just funny dunce-cap looking things that the FAA left standing for aerial visual comic-relief, surely no one actually uses them anymore?) for any real navigating on January 1st 2020. Since you're a pilot you know what I mean by that.
And do you have any idea what the statistics are of CFIT accidents before the mid-70's (when GPWS was mandated on part-121 aircraft) and after the mid-70's? CFIT accidents dropped from a surprisingly-scarily-common occurrence to basically NONE after ground-prox was mandated.
TONSSSS of 20,000+ hour ATP-rated pilots have flown perfectly good-working non-GPWS-equipped airplanes right into the ground. And thats with TWO pilots checking eachothers work!! They still managed to do it! People make mistakes, people are dumb. :rofl:
Ben