Not jabbing anyone here, just proving a point that everything breaks and solid axles are not bullet proof.
IFS is much better than a solid axle. Want to go backwards on technology? great buy a solid axle Ram or Ford. While your at it just saddle up the donkey and go green...
GM's system has its weak links, but IFS in general is not the issue. It is the superior choice when built properly, but it costs a lot of money to build right.
The system below is the IFS on our Fendt tractor, it's a bit beefier than GM IFS, but I still wouldn't trade is for a solid axle tractor.
F*ck solid axle!!!
"What's that? Death wobble! Oh no, now I have to spend twice as much as I would to bullet proof an IFS- to repair my front end- then I have to spend more money to "prevent" (aka prolong the inevitable) the death wobble! Oh and my truck still drives like crap when I'm done!"
Do what I did; Call Dmaxstore, whip out the debit card- say "stage 3 package please", hang up, await parts- and install! Lol
Let's face it, a Duramax in "race mode" looks badass! :thumbup
You don't need braces with a straight PPE style centerlink. Since its straight, rotating would do nothing to change the steering geometry. I do like the idea of reinforcing the idler/bracket though.
Sent from my iPhone.
^^^ hahaha!!! Ifs has better front articulation? And it rides better? My truck rides so much better now with coilovers and a 4 link set up then it did in stock form. Both on and on offroad.
Would you put your sfa up to a competition ifs? 4 link is a good setup but it will never outflex a long travel ifs. Stock ifs has a whopping what 2" compression and maybe 6-8" drop But a long travel set up can 18-24 inch travel. If I was rock crawling or mud bogging I may consider an sfa but that's about it.
Even weight bearing ifs can be made to be stronger. Anyone who has been in or around military up armored Humvee scan see the abuse those systems take with minimal breakage. The uparmored excursions we used had hub issues and with the weight death wobble was just somthing we lived with
I would like to go to 4wd on my old 03 dually and financially an sfa would be the best but I just front want the ride and wear and tear of an sfa.
IFS 4wd will never out articulate and drive as well in the rocks as a straight axle. Cv's wil always be the limiters. I'd take a straight axle there any day. Now if you wanna go fast and be in control, ifs is the game. Hell look at the king of the hammers cars. In the unlimited class they were 50/50 this year between ifs cars and straight axle. Guess who did better in the desert and who did better in the rocks?
Yes I would put my sas up against a competition ifs any day.
As far as the humvees go. I have gotten regular ass non up armored ones stuck and up armored ones stuck. In not so deep mud, sand and even high centered. Where solid axles would have prevailed.
I'll have to get a picture for you in the daylight of the Fendt in "race mode". You can deflate the suspension all the way down or inflate it all the way up. Its only really useful for waxing it, but it does wow a lot of people.
Thanks mang. Each has their place as we all stated. I personally will stick with ifs. If I lived in Florida or another southern state, this thing would be straight axle in a heart beat. After coilovering the front, I can't see a straight axle riding better unless you have a Carli kit on a dodge. It's hard to beat that setup right there but you all have to remember, it is specifically tuned for going fast and built for it. 80% of a good riding truck is in the shocks and suspension geometry. If I had the r and d carli has, I could make my truck surpass their straight axle kits but it wouldn't sell like their stuff. Why? Cost. Ifs long travel is not cheap to do, specially 4wd and again, that adds another limitation.
So in the end, each has shitty trade offs in the current state of every truck offered and offered in trucks past.
And with that said, I'll take my ifs hehe