Somebody has to try them to see if they work or not right. That's how things are proven. As stated, this is not for a DD application.
Which leads me to believe that the duty cycle is not very high seeing as only a seasonal life expectancy is all they are likely to last for. I can't see them being cost effective-at least not until putting Top Fuel Dragster rated parts in diesels starts netting Top Fuel Dragster money!
But who knows, other good may come out of this. If the rods hold up to the torque and HP estimated to be thrown at them, at least it will give a chance for the rest of the drivetrain to start failing and start recieving improvements as well!!
Correct the duty cycle is whats important( AKA Enlongation) the way we lessen or slow the amount of enlongation is to, lower RPM ,and Lower recipricating wieght, Both have been addresed in this application.
The recipricating wieght has been droped tremonously due to wrist pin , piston and ring package design, also the small end of the rod is much lighter(aluminum) We have about 250g less just in the piston assembly alone over the mahle/stock piston assembly. That speakes volumes to the resistance to rod enlongation.
The RPM at which these rods are normally designed for (8500-11000 RPM) is significantly less, again counter acting the enlongation efffect.
Last edited: