Im just drooling over the c10
Well maybe the old BBC will prove me wrong. I'll be racing them next week for sure.
Could you feel a noticeable difference with the headers and tune? And which tune did you use?
Thanks for the info. I was looking at some shorty headers for 700 cermic coated. Probably do that first since it needs different exhaust anyways.
Yeah I think they all burned oil. I've been told they didn't clearance the bore for each piston. Just did them all the same. So that's why most of them used oil.
Also I thought all the 8.1s were drive by wire. This 2000 is. The 03-04 was for the smaller ls motors.
Yeah mine has the 3:73. 13 mpg would be awesome. Thinking only 10 lol
The Headers and tune and woke the truck up quite a bit. It definietly made it alot more responsive and reved easier. The stainless headers on the 2004 were not cheap but I had originally planned on doing more to the truck when I bought them. Back then I had a tuned ECM from Westers garage out of Canada. There weren't nearly as many tuner options in 2004 for those trucks. My 2001 in the video above felt like it had more snort stock over the 2004. Odly enough the 2001 was rated at 340 HP and 455 TQ and the 2004 was 330 and 450 I think. They went to throttle by wire in 2003 so maybe thats where the differences come into play. If your 8.1 runs good I would think it would outrun a stock LBZ, but I never raced them. FYI, I bought both the 8.1's new and they both burnt a quart of oil every 3000-4000 miles. Keep us updated if you line them up, I'm very curious. The Alison behind the 8.1 shifts unbelievably well without all the diesel torque and defueling.