climax at BG!!!

Sledheadxp800r

That was only my tow tune
Dec 13, 2010
1,151
0
0
39
CT
I would hope triple turbo trucks are making way more than power than what single turbo 3.0 trucks make.
 

dracing70

SH--- GETTING EXPENSIVE!
Jun 12, 2007
1,210
0
36
45
mantua, oh
I would hope triple turbo trucks are making way more than power than what single turbo 3.0 trucks make.

Most of the super stock trucks I have saw are twins and I don't know very many 3.0 trucks making 2500 hp and 1800 to the wheels. More in the ballpark of 1200 rwhp.
 

JD Dave

In way over my head
May 19, 2008
2,388
0
0
Caledon, Ontario

Most of the super stock trucks I have saw are twins and I don't know very many 3.0 trucks making 2500 hp and 1800 to the wheels. More in the ballpark of 1200 rwhp.

Take your 1200hp to the wheels truck to a national 3.0 hook and let us know how you make out.
 

juddski88

Freedom Diesel
Jul 1, 2008
4,657
120
63
Chesterfield, Mass.

Most of the super stock trucks I have saw are twins and I don't know very many 3.0 trucks making 2500 hp and 1800 to the wheels. More in the ballpark of 1200 rwhp.

Be Aware of how these engines are dynoed at this power level for this application....accurately....its not the same as putting said engine in a race truck on a dynojet, mustang, or even superflow chassis dyno
 

SmokeShow

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
6,818
34
48
43
Lawrenceburg, KY
Shane was pulling your leg if he told you a "rwhp" because I'd bet a years wages his truck has never chassis dynoed so any number would be guess. It is well known he maxed out a 2500hp engine dyno. He's no longer the only one to have done so.

I've personally seen 1200fwhp 2.6 trucks. There again, none of the ones at the top chassis dyno their setups so any rwhp number would be a complete guess at drivetrain loss.

If you can believe em, the 3.0 trucks are said to be about 500hp more than 2.6 trucks. I've not witnessed those but theres a couple in this thread that compete solidly in the class and they're confirming those kinds of numbers.

Apparently its a much bigger jump from 3.0 to mod/ss than I thought! Shouldn't be too surprising though since I'm told just one of the super fancy hx82s out of the triple setup is $10k alone. Take that x3 & youve got a LOT of air on tap. I'm curious what they've figured out on how to get those schitty cummins heads to flow so much damn air!! Amazing!!
 

dracing70

SH--- GETTING EXPENSIVE!
Jun 12, 2007
1,210
0
36
45
mantua, oh
If they are really putting out those large numbers then that truly is amazing and I agree I would love to know how they move that much air also. The only real numbers I have witnessed with my eyes are my own. And I know how my truck stacks up in 2.6. And it's not at the 1200 level.

Shane was pulling your leg if he told you a "rwhp" because I'd bet a years wages his truck has never chassis dynoed so any number would be guess. It is well known he maxed out a 2500hp engine dyno. He's no longer the only one to have done so.

I've personally seen 1200fwhp 2.6 trucks. There again, none of the ones at the top chassis dyno their setups so any rwhp number would be a complete guess at drivetrain loss.

If you can believe em, the 3.0 trucks are said to be about 500hp more than 2.6 trucks. I've not witnessed those but theres a couple in this thread that compete solidly in the class and they're confirming those kinds of numbers.

Apparently its a much bigger jump from 3.0 to mod/ss than I thought! Shouldn't be too surprising though since I'm told just one of the super fancy hx82s out of the triple setup is $10k alone. Take that x3 & youve got a LOT of air on tap. I'm curious what they've figured out on how to get those schitty cummins heads to flow so much damn air!! Amazing!!
 

Yellow Jacket

WannaBe Sled Puller
Feb 11, 2009
917
0
16
Waterloo, IA
I know of a cummins powerplant with a new 3.0" hx82 made 1670 fwhp on Engelkings dyno in Illinois from a reliable source...enough said

I'm pretty sure a dropbox only robs 10% or less hp... thats 1400+ to wheels with a 3.0, and I can speak from experience when I say now the winning 3.0 truck is the best driver of the night, 3.0's r having trouble "hooking" out of the hole on 6 dot tires, and the SS diesels have had that trouble on bar tires for last 2 season.

I also know of a 4.1" limited prostock, single charger, with a slotted compressor cover making 2250-2300 fwhp, I guarantee even with twins SS diesel trucks are 2800+ and triples are 3000 hp MINIMUM. Climax's twins were small compared to Shane's, so he was probably 17-1800 hp, not sure of he changed setup, and his truck ran well, but wasn't a first place contender, hopefully will be soon :) No disrespect to Kyle, runs way better than mine!
 

JD Dave

In way over my head
May 19, 2008
2,388
0
0
Caledon, Ontario
I know of a cummins powerplant with a new 3.0" hx82 made 1670 fwhp on Engelkings dyno in Illinois from a reliable source...enough said

I'm pretty sure a dropbox only robs 10% or less hp... thats 1400+ to wheels with a 3.0, and I can speak from experience when I say now the winning 3.0 truck is the best driver of the night, 3.0's r having trouble "hooking" out of the hole on 6 dot tires, and the SS diesels have had that trouble on bar tires for last 2 season.

I also know of a 4.1" limited prostock, single charger, with a slotted compressor cover making 2250-2300 fwhp, I guarantee even with twins SS diesel trucks are 2800+ and triples are 3000 hp MINIMUM. Climax's twins were small compared to Shane's, so he was probably 17-1800 hp, not sure of he changed setup, and his truck ran well, but wasn't a first place contender, hopefully will be soon :) No disrespect to Kyle, runs way better than mine!

Thanks for sharing that with us.
 

CurtisEmery

New member
Mar 21, 2008
486
0
0
Ontario, Canada
Shane was pulling your leg if he told you a "rwhp" because I'd bet a years wages his truck has never chassis dynoed so any number would be guess. It is well known he maxed out a 2500hp engine dyno. He's no longer the only one to have done so.

I've personally seen 1200fwhp 2.6 trucks. There again, none of the ones at the top chassis dyno their setups so any rwhp number would be a complete guess at drivetrain loss.

If you can believe em, the 3.0 trucks are said to be about 500hp more than 2.6 trucks. I've not witnessed those but theres a couple in this thread that compete solidly in the class and they're confirming those kinds of numbers.

Apparently its a much bigger jump from 3.0 to mod/ss than I thought! Shouldn't be too surprising though since I'm told just one of the super fancy hx82s out of the triple setup is $10k alone. Take that x3 & youve got a LOT of air on tap. I'm curious what they've figured out on how to get those schitty cummins heads to flow so much damn air!! Amazing!!

Lots and lots of manifold pressure....
 

Yellow Jacket

WannaBe Sled Puller
Feb 11, 2009
917
0
16
Waterloo, IA
I also know what the "real" numbers on head flows are from a guy that did my cylinder heads for this season...

And with a good cylinder head guy dmax heads r the ones that suck! He can get way more flow out of a hogged out welded up stock 12 valve cummins head than we can imagine from ported big valve dmax heads... let alone if he uses a cast Hamilton 12V cummins head.

We are in big need of Brodix heads, too bad the cost isn't manageable on them
 

x MadMAX DIESEL

<<<< No Horsepower
Dec 30, 2008
7,535
1
38
34
Lexington, Ky
I also know what the "real" numbers on head flows are from a guy that did my cylinder heads for this season...

And with a good cylinder head guy dmax heads r the ones that suck! He can get way more flow out of a hogged out welded up stock 12 valve cummins head than we can imagine from ported big valve dmax heads... let alone if he uses a cast Hamilton 12V cummins head.

We are in big need of Brodix heads, too bad the cost isn't manageable on them
what my sources say also
 

Dirtymaxx03

Active member
Aug 4, 2009
3,109
1
38
I knew a cummins head had a lot more potential than the Dmax or Strokes...

What flows more though, a 12v head or a 24v head, assuming both are balls to the wall ported, etc.
 

Yellow Jacket

WannaBe Sled Puller
Feb 11, 2009
917
0
16
Waterloo, IA
I knew a cummins head had a lot more potential than the Dmax or Strokes...

What flows more though, a 12v head or a 24v head, assuming both are balls to the wall ported, etc.

12v head does with max effort, the right 24v head flows well and can go milder on cam for street use, but all out 12v head gains flow past .700-.750 lift... 4 valves get 2 shrouded 4 all out performance or race I think...
 

Dirtymaxx03

Active member
Aug 4, 2009
3,109
1
38
12v head does with max effort, the right 24v head flows well and can go milder on cam for street use, but all out 12v head gains flow past .700-.750 lift... 4 valves get 2 shrouded 4 all out performance or race I think...

That's almost exactly what I was told a few hours ago. The 12v head will flow more when you get into the larger lift cams. Thanks