His springs are worn/sagged based upon the measurement of the gap he took from the overload leaf to the rest of the pack. His spring pack is sitting physically lower and doesn't take much movement for them to engage the overload leaf. On a spring pack in good health, there is a much larger gap that allows the spring to flex the much more compliant leafs as opposed to the heavy/very stiff overload.
Do you guys have a measurement range for what's OK and what's considered worn out?no one realizes how bad the rear springs get because its a gradual over time occurrence. the leafs on a 01-2020 2500hd are virtually unchanged in their overall design for ride height and overload clearance. 2011 they switched to a higher capacity leaf pack, made the change again in 2020 but the concept of having a linear spring rate as the suspension collapes onto the overload is still there and you MUST have decent clearance above the overload for it to actually work right and ride nice. its all designed together.
If you call Deaver they should be able to custom make you a pack that's stock ride height.as mine are getting older, and rougher and rougher, I find myself thinking about "someday" seeing if I can get a lift spring from Deaver and mounting it under the axle to retain stock height
It’s from the prothane poly style he installed, not the hydraulic rear ones.
You need to look at your rear springs. More times than not I’m seeing guys with worn out rear leaf packs and the overload is maybe a 1/2” from the main pack. Makes the truck ride rough. You should have 1.75-2” clearance at the very back edge of the overload and the leaf pack. New pack isn’t too expensive or have them re-arched
Do you guys have a measurement range for what's OK and what's considered worn out?
I'm wondering if a Deaver mini-pack would be a decent band-aid as well, since it would get rid of the overload and sort of help the rest of the spring pack keep its arch? And with the bags, you could retain heavy load compliance with the bags and no overload.
I loved how my mini-pack rode on my LBZ. Ideally you'd get a full pack or have the whole thing re-arched.
If you call Deaver they should be able to custom make you a pack that's stock ride height.
Got it, thanks. Hopefully y'all figure it out soon lol, there's some threads where there's just a bunch of one letter postsBold above. it wasnt there before, was part of this issue we are having where sections of posts got deleted. ive fixed this thread though.
adding a mini pack is just a badaid. sagging leafs mean preload has fallen off and spring rate has fallen off. the deaver mini pack will put some back in but at the expense of the mini pack not set for the correct spring rate above it and more load placed on the mini pack. it will work, just not as well as it could and will wear out quicker. the idea behind the mini pack is to create a more linear spring rate and not so much a progressive as stock is.
Got it, thanks. Hopefully y'all figure it out soon lol, there's some threads where there's just a bunch of one letter posts
Sure, agreed it would be a band-aid, although you mentioned things I didn't consider.
With a properly arched main pack, no overload, and a mini-pack - you're saying this is a fully linear setup? I thought there was still some linear rate to the main pack without the overload. Obviously the spring rate drastically increases when it gets to the overload, but without it and instead air bags in place and properly inflated, wouldn't that keep the ride smoother even with a heavy load over the axle VS having an overload?
right the bolded part is what I thought but just wanted to confirm because I thought you were saying without overload it’s linear.no, no leaf spring will be 100% linear like a coil-over spring (even coil-over springs are not perfect but as close as you can get). it will be much closer to a linear rate spring setup (less progressive). the stock leaf pack is all progressive, the overload creates this because the leafs are laying on top of the overload as suspension compresses. this starts to spike spring rate till they are completely on top of it and then the whole overload as to flex, in which case it goes back to semi linear rate.
air bags are a whole nother issue within them selves. they are progressive rate and on small helper bags, its very hard to make them not sky rocket the spring rate up as suspension compresses. sadly, without knowing the rate of each individual spring, its hard to say how many leafs would work with a helper bag in place to get you load capacity and not make it ride like a brick loaded or unloaded. I personally HATE helper bags, loaded or not. They just limit your ride comfort and suspension travel.
I ended up buying the OEM style from rock auto as I was afraid the poly type would be harsher and/or louder and since I don’t haul anything heavier than my boat I should be fine
questions now are which side do these press in from? Doesnt matter They have a lip like the factory bushings but just on one side. So would I press them in from the back side And the lip would be on the frame rail side or the outside and the lip would be on the wheel well side? again, doesnt matter Should I grease them up before installing and what grease? no need Does it matter what Leaf spring is on what side? If they have been re-arched, it wont matter Also do I take the truck off the stands and on the ground before tightening up the leaf spring eye bolts? Yes for ALL the spring pivot bolts (front spring to hanger bolt, rear spring to shackle bolt, shackle to shackle mount bolt. just barely get the nut up to the steel, lower down, torque to spec)
right the bolded part is what I thought but just wanted to confirm because I thought you were saying without overload it’s linear.
I’ve never really messed with bags, had some Firestone’s for my LBZ with that deaver mini pack but never wound up mounting them. But I’ve heard they are tough to get setup right like you said.
a little more on topic, are the isolators being talked about in the thread the ones from the GMT900 trucks? I seem to recall doing a swap to some newer OEM isolators on the back of my LBZ ext cab and it helped the ride smooth out.
That's what I thought. I couldn't remember the details of what I had done, and I'd like to do it again for my new truck.Correct, the rear mount on extended cabs and crew cabs can be switched over to the GMT900 rear mount. GM did this under a TSB for frame beaming in an attempt to smooth out the ride.
That's what I thought. I couldn't remember the details of what I had done, and I'd like to do it again for my new truck.
If I also remember correctly, on an ext cab you only do the back two mounts, but on a crew you do the back two and middle. The fronts in either case need to stay the GMT800 style?
It’s from the prothane poly style he installed, not the hydraulic rear ones.
You need to look at your rear springs. More times than not I’m seeing guys with worn out rear leaf packs and the overload is maybe a 1/2” from the main pack. Makes the truck ride rough. You should have 1.75-2” clearance at the very back edge of the overload and the leaf pack. New pack isn’t too expensive or have them re-arched