Hi Huffy! So a few years ago I built a 79 Camaro with a 350 H.O. engine. I used that same Comp Cam, the 268H, and I really liked it. I ran an Edelbrock RPM intake (not AirGap) and an Edelbrock carb, and the peak RPM curves of all 3 matched up really well. Break in was very easy, throttle response was fantastic, and the idle sounded awesome.
Having said that, I wish I would have gone one step up. I went with a stock-ish 1800 stall torque converter, which turned into a 2100 stall converter in my heavy car. Even though it still mated perfectly with the cam, it felt a little reserved after the torque converter upgrade.
If you have any plans at all, I would go one step up with the cam to the....280H? It is still mild, very streetable, great idle, and won't kill your gas mileage. That way you have a little more play with your torque converter, and down the road I would rather upgrade that than my cam again.
Going above the "recommended" stall speed with your cam, especially by such a small amount, won't hurt anything whatsoever, it just means that the torque and HP curves aren't perfectly synced. What this will do though is somewhat future proof your car, because any little performance changes you do down the road will be getting closer to the sweet spot on the cam one step higher, but one step farther away from the sweet spot of the 268H.
Edit: Also, 10.1:1 compression is a good compromise IMO. A lot of the engines from that era were 9.5:1, my engine had 11.5:1 and if I dared run even midgrade I could hear the engine knocking. This also meant that if I ever wanted to turbo or supercharge it, I automatically had to do new heads, or risk being at 14:1 or worse and blowing the engine up. Stick with what you've got.