By lower I assume you mean slower?
The "basic" answer to what I think the OP is asking would be "protecting" C1 with a 2.72:1 reduction ratio. Or am I lost?
And the next question for the OP, since I know roughly where you are from. Who built the trans and with whos parts?
In theory it should be giving the trans a mechanical advantage. Much like running planetaries allows a weaker lighter center section, and trans. The engine is doing the same work but where the stress is applied is moved around.
I could be wrong partially and don't know enough to say it will reduce the load on the C1s but I can only assume it's advantageous as pulling in low range has worked better for most.
3rd low is a shorter/lower ratio in gear slang. Gear slang is opposite of what is numerically/physically happening with the gears. Taller gears means faster gears which are generally physically shorter. I think the term comes from the gear being faster at a certain rpm. Could even be as stupid as taller people get more per stride just like a faster ratio goes further per input revolution. Lower/Higher is not as cut and dry. Some use lower the same as shorter others use it to describe a numerically lower ratio, others use it to talk about a slower ratio.
It's all confusing.
Bottom line. The overall ratio in 3rd low is slower than 1st high.
1st High: 3.10x1.00 = 3.10:1
3rd Low: 1.41x2.72= 3.83:1
Sent from my SCH-R970 using Tapatalk