It's simlar to a CVT in a tractor from what I've heard. I haven't read the DPmag article, but I have a hard time believing that something like that will hold up for 200k+ towing 15k+ regularly.
no... you are confusing a CVT with a hydrostatic transmission. they arent the same thing.
Hydrostatic transmissions are whats in tractors. CVT's are whats in golf carts and snow mobiles...
And yes,
HYDROSTATIC tranny's are incredibly durable, long lasting, and will take a lot of abuse. In any tractor I would take a hydrostatic trans over a manual trans ANY day, especialyl doing FEL work. With regular fluid and filter changes, a hydrostatic tractor tranny will far outlast a traditional clutch/manual tractor trans. When I used to work at a tractor dealer we had more than a handful come in with junk gearbox's, belts, clutches, etc. Only saw one bad hydrostatic transmission, and that was because the fan broke off and it overheated and wrecked the seals in the charge pump.
I love them, and if you take one apart they arent as complicated as they seem. Infinintely variable speeds, constant torque at all speeds and at 0rpm (like a PM electric motor), hardly any wear-parts, easy to cool efficently, and constantly lubricated by high pressure.
And of course one of the main side benefits of a hydrostatic tranny is you can tap into the charge pump's external releif control-pressure port, and run hydraulic cylinders, PTO stuff, etc...
ben