Kat Goes [email protected]! New best for Wendy.

McRat

Diesel Hotrodder
Aug 2, 2006
11,249
26
38
64
Norco CA
www.mcratracing.com
At Famoso today. Her slowest past of the day was 12.75 @ 105.

I attribute the drop in ET to:

Banks Ram-Air (Modified)
Turbo downpipe

Air was 1645 DA at the track, with a 3-10mph headwind.

Wendy is certainly running very well for mods it has.

We did not use the CoPilot or Tow/Haul even, but the truck shifted well.

You will never guess who was in the other lane when she clicked off the 12.6...

Or maybe you can!
 

SIKDMAX

Highway Burnouts!
Sep 14, 2007
4,698
0
0
37
Central Coast, Cali
www.sikdmax.com
Haha nice Pat - wish I would have stayed to actually run in brackets but I didnt want to push my tranny any more until its built... I was happy with my 13.71 :D

Whats going on with Casper?

Ive got a vid of your last 1/8 run uploaded that I havent posted anywhere yet... let me know if you want me to post it up here.
 

paint94979

Beer Nazi
Sep 18, 2006
11,715
8
38
37
Yes, I'm :D

He ran 13.46 @ 100.04


Drew has taken video, I haven't taken off the camera. But it was brackets, he dialed 13.40 to my 12.65.

www :witch:

Absolutely ridiculous. Maybe instead of a turbo, I need an LBZ?:D.............................. Na it must just be the driver.:D I believe that is the fastest tuning only Duramax to date?

I find that extremely strange he is running dual cp3's dyno's 530hp and is .8ths slower? It's one of several things. 1 dyno is inaccurate. 2 Fire can't drive. or 3 the new Body style's are less aerodynamic and the extra 200lbs effects more than anticipated.

What about the new 1058? does it not improve 1/4 times?
 

SIKDMAX

Highway Burnouts!
Sep 14, 2007
4,698
0
0
37
Central Coast, Cali
www.sikdmax.com
Hes running more power than that now.... 600rw. He had Labonte water meth on the truck and it failed and he was having major issues with the install. He was not happy to say the least in the pits.
 
Last edited:

JoshH

Daggum farm truck
Staff member
Vendor/Sponsor
Feb 14, 2007
13,713
774
113
Texas!!!
Congratulations Kat, those are very impressive times. I'm assuming this is #2 only, correct?
 

Kat

Wicked Witch of the West
Aug 2, 2006
17,899
13
38
60
Norco, CA
Congratulations Kat, those are very impressive times. I'm assuming this is #2 only, correct?

Correct, #2 only :D

Nick, Casper was there. Ran 7.1 in the 1/8th. But, there is a problem so we quit running him.

They changed Unlimited to 1/8th mile. Which we did not find out today. If we would of found out earlier we would have just run brackets.
 

paint94979

Beer Nazi
Sep 18, 2006
11,715
8
38
37
Correct, #2 only :D

Nick, Casper was there. Ran 7.1 in the 1/8th. But, there is a problem so we quit running him.

They changed Unlimited to 1/8th mile. Which we did not find out today. If we would of found out earlier we would have just run brackets.

Chris lied to me well actually he said he didn't know. Ill bit my tounge:D
 

LBZ

Super Moderator
Staff member
Jul 2, 2007
9,903
149
63
46
B.C.
Absolutely ridiculous. Maybe instead of a turbo, I need an LBZ?:D.............................. You hit the nail right on the head Nick!!!! Listen to Chris!!Na it must just be the driver.:D I believe that is the fastest tuning only Duramax to date?

I find that extremely strange he is running dual cp3's dyno's 530hp and is .8ths slower? It's one of several things. 1 dyno is inaccurate.Possibly 2 Fire can't drive. More than possible or 3 the new Body style's are less aerodynamic and the extra 200lbs effects more than anticipated. 200lbs is a lot of weight.

What about the new 1058? does it not improve 1/4 times?

Way to go Kat. Nice to see you can still hold your own-and then some!!:D
 

LBZrcks

.........
Jun 2, 2007
5,297
12
38
38
SoCal
Absolutely ridiculous. Maybe instead of a turbo, I need an LBZ?:D.............................. Na it must just be the driver.:D I believe that is the fastest tuning only Duramax to date?

I find that extremely strange he is running dual cp3's dyno's 530hp and is .8ths slower? It's one of several things. 1 dyno is inaccurate. 2 Fire can't drive. or 3 the new Body style's are less aerodynamic and the extra 200lbs effects more than anticipated.
What about the new 1058? does it not improve 1/4 times?

1. Same Dyno location
2. Not sure?
3. My CCLB 499+ tune was running faster than a CCSB dual fueled 530+ tune
-Both running 1058's and mine is a sc III his scIV