After having looked at a stock LLY intercooler and the Banks unit I can't honestly say there is much of a difference. What I do think helps out quite a bit with the Banks is the upgrade to the 3" tubing. With the way our stack is set up its quite hard to fit a larger intercooler into that space but I am sure with proper designing that you could increase the efficiency. I will be getting a PPE intercooler here in a couple of days and am interested to see how much different it is than the stock LB7. Also I will be adding a second map sensor in the tubing and re-wireing the IAT sensor to log before and after temps at the turbo inlet. I will post up when I get it done and let you know what I find.
Bentley
Just spent a weekend at 7000 ft doing just what you described.
The CAC tubes do make a nice difference, the 2.5" tubes are just too small for the hot side. If anything I recommend to people to change that side at a minimum. The cold side can be left alone, changing it is a smaller improvement.
BTW, with little effort I was able to get the "cold" side to near 300 F. I was verifying that all that mouthpiece theory was correct, and that big time heat is the result of oe intake restriction. I feel very confident now that it is the main culprit in LLY overheat, along with the hot air intake design.
The elevation just exacerbates the condition, with still lower CIP.
Will look forward to your testing. But if using a stock LLY intake, THAT is the best area to improve intercooling. That is prevent the heat from forming in the first place.