GM files for bankruptcy

Poltergeist

Ghost in the Machine
Aug 1, 2006
29,563
1
36
Ontario, Calif.
www.poltergeist.us
WASHINGTON - General Motors filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection Monday as part of the Obama administration’s plan to shrink the automaker to a sustainable size and give a majority ownership stake to the federal government.

GM’s bankruptcy filing is the fourth-largest in U.S. history and the largest for an industrial company. The company said it has $172.81 billion in debt and $82.29 billion in assets.

As part of its restructuring, GM w ill permanently close nine more plants and idle three others to trim production and labor costs under bankruptcy protection.

Assembly plants in Pontiac, Mich., and Wilmington, Del. will close this year, while plants in Spring Hill, Tenn., and Orion, Mich., will shut down production but remain on standby. A union spokesman at the GM plant in Spring Hill confirms the 2,500 employees there have been told the plant will be idled.

As it reorganizes, the fallen icon of American industrial might will rely on $30 billion of additional financial assistance from the Treasury Department and $9.5 billion from Canada. That’s on top of about $20 billion in taxpayer money GM already has received in the form of low-interest loans.

GM will follow a similar course taken by smaller rival Chrysler LLC, which filed for Chapter 11 protection in April. A judge gave Chrysler approval to sell most of its assets to Italy’s Fiat, moving the U.S. automaker closer to a quick exit from court protection, possibly this week.

President Barack Obama said Monday that a court’s approval of the sale of Chrysler's assets to Fiat will allow the automaker to emerge stronger from bankruptcy. He said in a statement that the decision “paves the way for the new Chrysler to successfully emerge from bankruptcy as a new, stronger, more competitive company for the future.”

The plan is for the federal government to take a 60 percent ownership stake in the new GM. The Canadian government would take 12.5 percent, with the United Auto Workers getting a 17.5 percent share and unsecured bondholders receiving 10 percent. Existing GM shareholders are expected to be wiped out.

The administration expects the new GM could emerge from bankruptcy in as little as 60 to 90 days.

President Barack Obama is scheduled to address the nation about GM’s future at midday from Washington, and GM CEO Fritz Henderson is to follow him with a news conference in New York.

Beyond the bankruptcy announcement Monday, GM is expected to reveal 14 plants it intends to close. One of those plants, however, will be retooled to build a small car.

GM’s filing comes 32 days after a Chapter 11 filing by Chrysler, which also was hobbled by plunging sales of cars and trucks as the worst recession since the Great Depression intensified.

The third of the one-time Big Three, Ford Motor Co., has also been stung hard by the sales slump, but it avoided bankruptcy by mortgaging all of its assets in 2006 to borrow roughly $25 billion, giving it a financial cushion GM and Chrysler lacked.

The downsized GM’s brands will be limited to Chevrolet, Cadillac, GMC and Buick. Its Pontiac, Saturn, Hummer and Saab operations will be either sold or closed. GM said it was finalizing a deal to sell Hummer, and plans for Saturn are expected to be announced within weeks.

GM, whose headquarters tower over downtown Detroit, said it believed the filing was not an acknowledgment of failure, but a necessary way to cleanse itself in an orderly fashion of problems and costs that have dogged it for decades.

Trading of GM shares was halted early Monday after they plunged Friday as low as 74 cents, the lowest price in the company’s 100-year history. GM will be kicked out of the Dow Jones industrial average because rules established by the News Corp. unit that oversees the index prohibit it from including companies that have filed for bankruptcy.

GM first sought help from the Bush administration and Congress last year as it was in the midst of being staggered by $30.9 billion in losses and seeing its cash resources shrink by more than $19 billion.

Consumers, worried about the economy and the future of GM, shied away from the company’s cars and trucks this year even after President George W. Bush promised loans and Obama followed through with billions more in assistance — plus a stiff set of new requirements GM was ordered to meet.
When GM failed to do so by a March 31 deadline, Obama forced out CEO Rick Wagoner and replaced him with Henderson.

Wagoner served at the helm since 2000 and was the face of GM when he first flew on the company jet to ask Congress for aid. After a firestorm of negative publicity, Wagoner rode in a hybrid Chevrolet Malibu from Detroit to Washington for a second set of withering questions before lawmakers.

But that amounted to only a sideshow as the automaker’s financial position worsened. Its revenues plunged almost 50 percent in the quarter ended March 30 and it racked up another $6 billion in losses.

The Henderson-led GM faced a government-imposed June 1 deadline to restructure, slash costs and modify contracts with its union and dealers.

But meeting most of those demands, plus a late agreement by many bondholders to swap portions of the $27 billion in debt they are owed for shares in a new GM, were not enough to prevent the court filing.

In fact, it was an all-out sprint to Monday’s filing, as GM quickly sought to nail down deals with its union, bondholders and sell off brands and along with most of its Opel operations in Europe in an effort to appear in court with a near-complete plan to quickly emerge as a leaner company with a chance to become profitable.

In Germany on Sunday, the government agreed to lend GM’s Opel unit $2.1 billion, a move necessary for Magna International Inc. to acquire the company. The Canadian auto parts supplier will take a 20 percent stake in Opel and Russian-owned Sberbank will take a 35 percent, giving the two businesses a majority. GM retains 35 percent of Opel, with the remaining 10 percent going to employees.

In the U.S., the United Auto Workers’ ratification of concessions, announced Friday, will save GM $1.3 billion per year and bring its labor costs close to those of its Japanese competitors. The new UAW deal freezes wages, ends bonuses and eliminates some noncompetitive work rules.

It also moves billions in retiree health care costs off GM’s books. In exchange for its ownership stake, $6.5 billion of interest-bearing preferred shares, and a $2.5 billion note, the trust will take on responsibility for all health care costs for retirees starting next year. Higher health care costs alone accounted for a $1,500-per-car cost gap between GM and Japanese vehicles.

GM will offer buyouts and early retirement packages to all of its 61,000 hourly workers as it plans to shrink overall employment. The company also has about 27,000 white collar employees. In contrast, GM employed 618,000 Americans in 1979, more than any other company.

GM earlier outlined a plan to cut about 1,100, or 40 percent, of its dealers by the end of 2010. It also plans to shed about 500 dealerships that market the Saturn, Hummer and Saab brands.

But just cutting labor and overhead costs won’t be enough to save the company. It also has been working to streamline its engineering and design, as well as standardize many parts so they can go into multiple models.

The once powerful GM earns a place in history as the largest U.S. industrial company to file for bankruptcy protection, and the fourth-largest company overall to do so based on its $82.29 billion in assets.

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s September 2008 bankruptcy filing is the nation’s largest with $691 billion in assets, and likely served as a catalyst for GM — and Chrysler’s — downfall, as it hastened the erosion of credit markets, making it more difficult for consumers and dealers to finance new vehicles.

Full Story
 

Vrabel

TOYAHOLIC
May 22, 2008
3,434
0
0
57
Hewitt, NJ
Lets keep our fingers crossed. We have enough crap here made in china! Lets not get stuck with thier cars too.
 

stacks04

Member
Nov 16, 2007
792
0
16
Terryville,Ct
:( hopefully now they can restructure and bounce back from there past financial mistakes .

i agree, but the problem i see is they waited so long the govt took over to much control and now we truly have goverment motors. they say the nationalization of gm will only be temp. they also said that about the income tax..... gm will never again be a public company. obama has soley overtakin the biggest american company in 5 months and dont think he will stop there. chrysler and gm are now government owned and i'd bet by years end ford will have "mysterious" money problems.
 

McRat

Diesel Hotrodder
Aug 2, 2006
11,249
26
38
64
Norco CA
www.mcratracing.com
I guess the new adminstration is smarter than everyone else in history.

No government takeover of an auto mfr has ever helped. Bureaucrats just suck at it.

Ask England.
 

05smoker

I'm officially done!
Mar 30, 2007
2,379
0
36
Lebanon, OH
i agree, but the problem i see is they waited so long the govt took over to much control and now we truly have goverment motors. they say the nationalization of gm will only be temp. they also said that about the income tax..... gm will never again be a public company. obama has soley overtakin the biggest american company in 5 months and dont think he will stop there. chrysler and gm are now government owned and i'd bet by years end ford will have "mysterious" money problems.

X2 :mad:
 

Fingers

Village Idiot
Vendor/Sponsor
Apr 1, 2008
1,715
86
48
White Oak, PA
Chrysler will become Fiat. Government is off the hook there.

GM should have gone to Bankruptcy early on before they were on the hook so much with the government. IMO anyway. I shudder to think what kind of company results from the marriage of the Government and the Union.

FWIW, Obama didn't create this situation. It has been looming for several years now.
 

Jasondt2001

New member
May 3, 2008
373
0
0
Salinas, Ca
Chrysler will become Fiat. Government is off the hook there.

GM should have gone to Bankruptcy early on before they were on the hook so much with the government. IMO anyway. I shudder to think what kind of company results from the marriage of the Government and the Union.

FWIW, Obama didn't create this situation. It has been looming for several years now.

The new car company will be nothing but hybrids and smart cars... (Gosh I hope I'm DEAD wrong!) but with the governments ever changing fuel standards over safety I just see us going down that road.
What I DON'T get is how politicians think they can FLOOD the market (monopolize) a market with these 'ideal' cars, give the consumer NO choice but them and think that'll be a profitable business.
I know plenty of people that used to be in a new car every 2 years...now they have 4 year old cars (oh the shame.. LOL!!) because they don't LIKE the new cars...
 

malibu795

misspeelleerr
Apr 28, 2007
8,236
550
113
42
in the buckeye state
The new car company will be nothing but hybrids and smart cars... (Gosh I hope I'm DEAD wrong!) but with the governments ever changing fuel standards over safety I just see us going down that road.
What I DON'T get is how politicians think they can FLOOD the market (monopolize) a market with these 'ideal' cars, give the consumer NO choice but them and think that'll be a profitable business.
I know plenty of people that used to be in a new car every 2 years...now they have 4 year old cars (oh the shame.. LOL!!) because they don't LIKE the new cars...

try again... read history of the fasicist goverment, gemany, russia itally......

goverment control of and industry has always brought povety to a nation.
 

mmangels22

Monty Python Rules.
Feb 12, 2009
801
0
0
San Jose, CA
Chrysler will become Fiat. Government is off the hook there.

GM should have gone to Bankruptcy early on before they were on the hook so much with the government. IMO anyway. I shudder to think what kind of company results from the marriage of the Government and the Union.

FWIW, Obama didn't create this situation. It has been looming for several years now.

Yep, GM and chrysler sold big huge vehicles when smaller vehicles were popular. They didn't think about the future, instead thinking about how Dick and Jane were going to transport the nuclear family. That is where they screwed up. Oh yeah labor costs are a part of the equation but GM and chrysler made financially retarded decisions about where the company was going. Now they are paying for it. 100 years and no bankruptcy now they are fighting for their lives. I hope GM pulls their heads out from an "unnamed" orifice and builds cars that people want.
 

z79outlaw

Member
Apr 20, 2007
793
0
16
37
Salem WI
Yep, GM and chrysler sold big huge vehicles when smaller vehicles were popular. They didn't think about the future, instead thinking about how Dick and Jane were going to transport the nuclear family. That is where they screwed up. Oh yeah labor costs are a part of the equation but GM and chrysler made financially retarded decisions about where the company was going. Now they are paying for it. 100 years and no bankruptcy now they are fighting for their lives. I hope GM pulls their heads out from an "unnamed" orifice and builds cars that people want.

Wrong, GM's vehicles are good sellers, especially the new malibu, and the 06+ revision of the Impala, GM doesent have a problem at all selling vehicles nobody wants, the stupid American public cant get over the notion that American quality today in 2009 is far superior than Jap quality. GM has been marketing, little shit box economy cars for years remember the metro? How is that any different than the Yaris or a Scion? Its not. GM sold what people wanted, they turned a profit despite the odds and ridiculous union demands. Gas prices go up and GM got hurt bad, and it has nothing to do with them not making vehicles people wanted, rest assured they do as they always have.

The reason they hurt has to do with miniscule profit ratings, in the competitive passenger car market, they had/have the truck market locked down, they could afford to charge more, they made money on trucks and SUV's because they had and still have absolutely no competition. They cant make money selling cars period. Not aslong as Toyota, Nissian, and whatever other jap brands there are selling similar cars for the same price, with half the over head.

I beleive I've put it in a way that even a democrat can understand. GM has always been ahead of the curve or at least with the pack. If it wasnt for there strong emphasis on trucks and SUV's they wouldnt of lasted aslong as they have. But to claim they have there heads in there asses and cant make a vehicle people want is just plain stupid.
 

Fingers

Village Idiot
Vendor/Sponsor
Apr 1, 2008
1,715
86
48
White Oak, PA
Yep, GM and chrysler sold big huge vehicles when smaller vehicles were popular. They didn't think about the future, instead thinking about how Dick and Jane were going to transport the nuclear family. That is where they screwed up. Oh yeah labor costs are a part of the equation but GM and chrysler made financially retarded decisions about where the company was going. Now they are paying for it. 100 years and no bankruptcy now they are fighting for their lives. I hope GM pulls their heads out from an "unnamed" orifice and builds cars that people want.

Maybe, but GM and Chrysler's small cars did not sell. They sold what people would buy from them. Pull the sales figures for GM. (they are on the web) 1/2 of all sales were trucks! It isn't that they didn't or don't offer the small cars, the US buyer simply has not bought them. No Government action is going to fix that.

Perhaps the biggest thing GM lacks is youth. Talk to your son or daughter. What car do they want. Is it made in the US?
 

Vrabel

TOYAHOLIC
May 22, 2008
3,434
0
0
57
Hewitt, NJ
And today I heard GM's selling Hummer. Maybe diesel will now become more popular like in europe, and burn other than fossil fuel like they where invented to.
 

stacks04

Member
Nov 16, 2007
792
0
16
Terryville,Ct
smaller vehicles are not popular, gm's problem was not having to many big vehicles, it was the federal govt. they intervened in the 70's to regulate the every living crap for emmisions. they did what they were threatened and it slowly tanked the company. it got them so far behind in r&d on new tech because of designing retrofit emmisions junk that the foreign cars took hold. couple that with minimal govt regulation on the foreign companies and lack of unionization there "small" cheap powerful cars took off. not nealy enough though to keep up with the american truck line. once gm got there stuff together in the early 2000's and came out with some more desireable cars the mid size and compact line grew alot, but by then it was to late. the unions had just swallowed the company whole and in 08 got there man elected now he will repay them. he got gm to agree to a governmantal bailout/bankruptcy and now he will negotiate the union deals. if they change at all through this.
 

'03duramax

I love cheer******s
Sep 16, 2006
190
0
16
WA
Wow, more gov. control, hello socialism. Not like we couldn't see this coming with all the past years' events.
 

MACKIN

Smell My Finger...
Aug 14, 2006
3,948
1
0
Connecticut
Maybe, but GM and Chrysler's small cars did not sell. They sold what people would buy from them. Pull the sales figures for GM. (they are on the web) 1/2 of all sales were trucks! It isn't that they didn't or don't offer the small cars, the US buyer simply has not bought them. No Government action is going to fix that.

Perhaps the biggest thing GM lacks is youth. Talk to your son or daughter. What car do they want. Is it made in the US?


Very true you will not run into any younger generation that says I want to buy a GM vehicle. Ford has done OK along with Chrysler in grabbing 'some' youth.

These same 'youth' has gotten or current administration in office. :(

Perhaps this is the motive behind the current Admin, to push for smaller cars with plenty of bling. Factory chrome 20's on low profiles and license plate rattling sub boxes in the trunk are the future GM cars. :rolleyes:

In commone sence you are correct GM is behind in times .