I don't know enough to do all the math and stuff on it, but one thing that still puzzles me about hybrid type things and electricity is the whole conservation of energy law or whatever.
The output can never be the same as the input due to efficiency loss. So they way I think about it, and I could be wrong, is using a fossil fuel to create electricity to run a vehicle is a step backwards. It takes so many units of energy to drive a vehicle so far in a certain amount of time (work) no matter how that's generated. If you add a step, don't you lose something? Now regenerative kinds of things like capturing energy during brakeing make more sense to me.
I'm pretty sure it doesn't make sense to burn coal to charge batteries and claim it's green. Quick search says around 40-60% of power is generated by coal. Wind, hydroelectic, nuclear all have their sticking points too.
So until that all figured out.....it's fill it with diesel or gas for me :rofl:
Edited to add: I also understand if you can significantly cut emissions or greatly increase efficiency from the generation of said power that could be an offset, but I don't know how that works either in practice.
Here's the deal. What does it take to build a 9 second street Fiero? The fact that a guy working in garage can do it with a battery car for about the same cost as a gas buildup is impressive.
In 10 years, it will be the gas cars that are the slugs. It already happened in the R/C airplane and cars, the gas engines are dying.
http://rimac-automobili.com/concept_one/introduction-20
This company is trying to build a serious supercar, to compete with Lambo, Ferrari, Bugatti, etc. Their goal is not to be the best electric car, it's to be the best supercar.
Now electrics don't make rumbling, don't have hood scoops, and if AWD, don't have big tires. A stock looking and quiet street Fiero could make a blown '56 Chevy it's biitch. It would rape a ZR-1 Corvette from a stoplight.
I'm a hotrodder. I can appreciate fast no matter how it's done.