The LML syncronizes the plungers of the pump to the cylinder firing. It has been known for a while that since fuel doesn't compress much, having the injector open during a pulse will shoot in more fuel.
For non-LML's, we know that our CP3 efficiency falls rapidly after 3500 rpm. I bench tested various CP3's at various RPM's and found that pump shoots less and less fuel per rev as you rev higher and higher.
The CP3 is geared is to "fire" 3 pulses per rev, which is 4 injector firings.
Gearing the CP3 to 1.33 to fire 4 events wouldn't be that good of an idea since you'd take a big hit in efficiency at high RPM.
But when running 2 CP3's, you could retard the speed to 2 firing per rev (.66) then put the two pumps out-of-phase 60 deg. This would make 4 pulses per rev, and delay the fade point to ~4700 rpm.
It would take a toothed drive for both the CP3's and a way of indexing the pumps.
Beer thirty, just thinking out loud ...
For non-LML's, we know that our CP3 efficiency falls rapidly after 3500 rpm. I bench tested various CP3's at various RPM's and found that pump shoots less and less fuel per rev as you rev higher and higher.
The CP3 is geared is to "fire" 3 pulses per rev, which is 4 injector firings.
Gearing the CP3 to 1.33 to fire 4 events wouldn't be that good of an idea since you'd take a big hit in efficiency at high RPM.
But when running 2 CP3's, you could retard the speed to 2 firing per rev (.66) then put the two pumps out-of-phase 60 deg. This would make 4 pulses per rev, and delay the fade point to ~4700 rpm.
It would take a toothed drive for both the CP3's and a way of indexing the pumps.
Beer thirty, just thinking out loud ...