cp3 dual or no?

dracing70

SH--- GETTING EXPENSIVE!
Jun 12, 2007
1,210
0
36
45
mantua, oh
ok so does anyone feedback on dual fuelers vs a modified single fueler i have been told that my single can be modified for half price of a dual to put out almost the same amount of fuel as duals. does anyone have any input
 

codyn

Member
Aug 26, 2007
412
0
16
urbana ohio
well twin cp3 will hold rail pressure at 26000 psi and i have a II mod pump an it will spike to 25000 but it drop down to 22000. since your in ohio the 2.6 class allow twin cp3`s. but if you go with a bigger charger then you will bend some rods. but imho i would go with the twins and be done with it.
 
Last edited:

Tacojedbob7

<====Ron Jeremy
Nov 25, 2007
55
0
6
ok so does anyone feedback on dual fuelers vs a modified single fueler i have been told that my single can be modified for half price of a dual to put out almost the same amount of fuel as duals. does anyone have any input

Just my .02 cents, I plan on just running a modified LBZ, primarily to reduce the initial cost...if I want more and when I can afford the whole shebang ill get a Dual CP3 kit, giving me a second CP3+ one that is modified.

I would be careful to run dual CP3s on a stock bottom end...
 

dracing70

SH--- GETTING EXPENSIVE!
Jun 12, 2007
1,210
0
36
45
mantua, oh
are you sayin bigger than the htt? for less than half the price of a dual though is pretty tempting especially with the guarantee of only about a 3 percent diff in flow. not to mention it will support a 425 hp tune
 

paint94979

Beer Nazi
Sep 18, 2006
11,715
8
38
37
are you sayin bigger than the htt? for less than half the price of a dual though is pretty tempting especially with the guarantee of only about a 3 percent diff in flow. not to mention it will support a 425 hp tune

Actually for say a Wicked Diesel LBZ CP3 it is only a few hundred dollars less than a PPE Dual Fueler Kit IMHO I would go with a Dual CP3 Kit and just run it detuned.